uuee

8 ms·

1.
by uuee 4y ago
Correct... NY needs much more apartments/citizens. Supply/demand.
2.
by uuee 4y ago
It's wrong to exclude people from your twitter feed -- you have to be inclusive. Just like you don't get to pick your neighbor (you have to accept anyone that moves in next door). Well same online! Don't exclude others, but r
3.
by uuee 4y ago
Women have it very good... it's men that are oppressed.
4.
by uuee 4y ago
A book on this subject: The Revolutionary Phenotype: The amazing story of how life begins and how it ends
5.
by uuee 4y ago
Different groups have different goals though. e.g. smart chess opponents.
6.
by uuee 4y ago
Nuance: Many women choose not to breast feed (e.g. wanting to go back to work or for reasons of convenience, etc). As family structure in Western countries weakens -- generational knowledge/support etc about these topics isn't pas
7.
by uuee 4y ago
... of what?
8.
by uuee 4y ago
Is this the plot to a dystopian novel?
9.
by uuee 4y ago
Just wait for the brain chips.
10.
by uuee 4y ago
>I come to HN because I want to be surprised and because I know we're all experiencing the same content. That's great for you... many people don't share your view though. Why do you want to force them to share your views.
11.
by uuee 4y ago
He is one of those "the rule is the rule; repeat mantra" type of people. If libraries didn't have the Dewey tagging system he would be saying the same thing about them. Thanks for the lobster link.
12.
by uuee 4y ago
Simplicity would be having tags to categories the posts. Just like a library has the Dewey Decimal Classification system -- if it were not for that it would be just a chaotic heap of books. What if someone missed 3 months worth of posts and
13.
by uuee 4y ago
>The availability or non-availability of tagging on any platform has nothing to do with the quality or usefulness of the content. It does if there is an ocean of info and you miss posts. >tagging is mostly useless because there needs
14.
by uuee 4y ago
Tags are hardly rocket science -- simple rules/standards could be setup. Why do you want to take the choice away from people to use tagging? Someone like me reads a lot (on other sites) and I skip 95% of the content here. Why should I
15.
by uuee 4y ago
Follow news/current events more closely (not just from MSM sources)
16.
Ask HN: Why doesn't HN have tags/filters?
15 points by uuee 4y ago|24 comments
17.
by uuee 4y ago
No. When we're 100% trans human robots -- that's when science will really start to advance!
18.
by uuee 4y ago
This type of thing is only possible in an environment where there is roughly homogeneous values. When values diverge extremely on basic issues -- only 1 side will trust the tech owners not to shadow ban, astro turf, fake polls etc.
19.
by uuee 4y ago
If you like this kind of topic Luke Smith's work might interest you... https://www.youtube.com/c/LukeSmithxyz Talks a lot about RSS, simple/minimalist websites, decentralization, fediverse, linux etc.
20.
by uuee 4y ago
This article was a great constructive criticism.
21.
by uuee 4y ago
>I am not sure what "participate in modern life" means for you... Probably things like needing a (google/apple) smartphone for mandated vaccine passports / coming digital ID's, digital currency etc.
22.
by uuee 4y ago
Individual migration is a very temporary solution. When the bank you just migrated to becomes a bit bigger -- it's the next target. Or some new law like digital ID's / one world currency make the migration irrelevant.
23.
by uuee 4y ago
Would have been interesting to start with the ice ages and the thawing out of the ice ages.