utrex

4 ms·

1.
by utrex 11y ago
Your argument is a little extreme, but with good testing you might be able to prove it in most cases. A few interesting concepts: Cost of carriage: a fistful of cash is easy to carry, but a truck full of benjamins is not. Should it be possi
2.
by utrex 11y ago
It's not just the alarmist tone or the jittery pacing that makes this listicle unworthy of broad attention, it's the rhetorical errors as well. The author attributes this change to a war on cash rather than a global trend in respo
3.
by utrex 11y ago
OP is referring to some source of authority but not actually naming it. If OP is referring to the message on the Treasury notes, OP's interpretation is reasonable but OP should read more texts.
4.
by utrex 11y ago
Where do you see this? I see authoritative statements saying otherwise. "Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise" https:/&#x
5.
by utrex 11y ago
It may cost that much to buy that capacity, but it costs a lot more than that to run the large scale organizations (CAPEX/OPEX) that build and buy these services. You're not just paying for a pipe, you're paying for the corpo
6.
by utrex 11y ago
You are right. I think that the value add is that in addition to getting to use 50TB of storage you also get good encryption and usable software.
7.
by utrex 11y ago
Right, you can, but you pay for export at $0.03 per GB.
8.
by utrex 11y ago
teraflop was right, it's $200 per snowball device job, which is currently limited to 50TB. Maybe that will change. You can order multiple jobs to import more data. You have 10 days to complete the transfer and ship it back and then it&