utrechtsouth

4 ms·

1.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
It's ironic that these workers "liberation" movements have resulted in the worlds largest slave labor camps and poverty on a scale never seen in free market countries. Not to mention genocide on a scale surpassing the nazis.
2.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
It's not mandatory. Actually it's likely illegal.
3.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
Well, this thread gives an example of a private initiative that provides a better alternative. :)
4.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
But they are government controlled.
5.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
> But it should be noted that this backlash and boycotting of western clothing brands is done by Chinese people, not by the Chinese government. No it's the government.
6.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
Sounds great! Also keep in mind that the legal options and PR options are tightly coupled. Regardless of the outcome of any legal option (e.g. "JO anmälan"), the PR generated around it may itself lead to a change if it gets enough
7.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
It looks like users use a different frontend than the one provided by the government. So it's users changing their own data. So that leaves a defense against... their own users? Makes no sense. Plus the tax payers funded the platform s
8.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
> But who decides who is skilled enough? Trial and error using a free market place.
9.
by utrechtsouth 6y ago
urvader, While there is a technical issue here, there is also a legal issue and a PR issue. Government institutions have a duty of care and a duty to help to private individuals. Since they are apparently working _against_ people in this ca