usuallyuselss

4 ms·

1.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
A lot of people are not that strong, sir. Otherwise, we would not have that many addicts, right?
2.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
I used "Anyone else believed", not "The article states". Yes, the error is on my side here, but the author was not very clear.
3.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
> Most heroin addicts, between the time the high dies and before the low begins, hate themselves for doing the drug. They aren't corrupt evil people, they're people who were stupid and didn't necessarily have to be weak willed to get ad
4.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
> So the laws should continue to make one a criminal for becoming addicted? Sorry, where did I say that? I am from Germany, drug use is not illegal here, only possession, trade and production. I am very well aware that this is a good th
5.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
I would be fine with this if hard drugs weren't "no return tickets".
6.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
> The assumption most people seem to base their conclusions on is that making drugs illegal reduces consumption. All empirical evidence so far - even from less biased sources than the wildly free-market Cato institute - shows that this
7.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
> but I can think of a number of business opportunities not only in legal narcotics trade, but also supporting industries Like making children addicted and profiting afterwards? Legalizing drugs like heroin, crack or coke is just sick.
8.
by usuallyuselss 18y ago
Anyone else believed drug consumption, possession, trading and the like were legal in portugal after reading this article? Well it is not. Only consumption and possession of small amounts is. And that is the case in a lot of European countr