Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
username90
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
You put way too much credit in the intelligence of hate mobs. People attack others for nonsense all the time. And I don't view gender bias as misogyny. Women are biased to believe women and men are biased to believe men, that is just n
62.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
I didn't say she did. Hate mobs can attack people for things that aren't true, happens all the time. There is a reason why we don't use hate mobs in the justice system. For example, lets say a twitter mob attacks a man for so
63.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
You speculated about the motive of the harassers, not the actual chain of events. Nothing you say here says that the harassers attacked her for being a woman instead of attacking her for cheating the game review system.
64.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Is there any documentation why people harassed her that isn't just speculation? The gamer culture works just like twitter mobs, they attack things for almost no reason and do it hard, harassment and death threats etc. There is no big p
65.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
My link contains a survey of 270 000 gamers on what kinds of games they play, I didn't base this on anecdotes.
66.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
> "female gamer == Candy Crush" It is mostly true though. Of course all genres has some women but they skew very heavily in that direction. Strategy games etc barely has any women at all, especially the more complicated ones. I
67.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
It is about battlefield 5, the last of us was last year. More specifically people didn't like the depiction of world war 2 in this trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7ZpQadiyqs
68.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
> Writing tests makes me a better programmer Writing bug free software without writing tests also makes you a better programmer. Practice helps, and practicing creating architectures that are easy to make correct without tests really mak
69.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
If they help their kids become great doctors or engineers why is that a problem? The problem isn't meritocracy but nepotism, when rich kids gets jobs or positions they wouldn't normally get with their merits.
70.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Cooperation and competition are both necessary. You look at competition to see what is possible and then you cooperate to make it happen. Without competition you don't know what to aim for. In the teams you work at likely some others h
71.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Italy is tech hostile like most of southern Europe, engineers are paid horribly compared to other professions so they usually leave north.
72.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
> I already described how male teachers treat girls condescendingly and how other family members can subvert their interests, as can their peers. There's a lot parents can do, but they can't be everywhere during their child
73.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
All you need is a supreme court redefining the interpretation such that now not using racial quotas is discriminatory. Then the laws stating that you can't discriminate based on race now work in favour of quotas.
74.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
You are talking about white privilege and not male privilege here. White privilege is pretty straight forward, male privilege isn't. The discussion in question is about white women pushing out white men from sectors where white women d
75.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Men are more overrepresented as targets by police violence than black people are. So you just brought up a strong example of female privilege, and more specifically white female privilege. But certainly not a white male privilege.
76.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Media, including big tech, is not sympathetic of men's issues. This is because male users are worth significantly less as advertisement targets, they would rather lose 3 male users over 1 female user. Its just pure capitalism and not i
77.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
It isn't the entire rest of society, it is a very small privileged group pushing this. A majority of men strongly disagrees with these things, but their voices aren't allowed to be heard.
78.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Its also spent fighting off other people who want to live on the same very limited natural resources, or you die from starvation. That is the reason we stopped living like that, it hasn't been possible for thousands of years since ther
79.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
This study is from June, USA still paid a lot of stimulus money in June. Being happy from stimulus money is a bubble, it wont last.
80.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Most people here on HN could do the same for their kids once their kids are adults.
81.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Labour without a job is almost useless. People with the ability to figure out good use of labour is the limiting factor, not labour itself. And it is really hard to get enough value out of labour to pay modern salaries. If you disagree, why
82.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
It means that the day to day job is easy and mindless, even if it is some ok work being done during those meetings. Doing all the real work in a meeting every other week does seem soul crushing.
83.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Some developers might love just mindlessly doing trivial tickets week after week, since it means they don't have to worry about anything since the job is so easy. But others will view that as soul crushing, you can't say it isn&#x
84.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Almost surely that will be coupled with an appstore and end the era of free computing for most people. It would be great if it didn't happen that way, but I don't see Apple or Microsoft doing it any other way.
85.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
In the early 90s you had a few megabytes of ram, running out of ram was a normal thing so your programs had to handle it everywhere. That makes the kind of testing we do on modern computers useless, our tests only works if we don't hav
86.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
So they make around 1 dollar per 1000 gallons? People rationing their shower time as urged by authorities must be proud that they could save a farmer somewhere a cent or two.
87.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Your argument is that USA did that to fight communist ideation, not that it was pushed by big corporations. Back then politicians were really afraid that communism would eat the world, I don't see why it is evidence that big corporatio
88.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Yeah, BigCo loves drugs since it is so easy to induce addiction and create stable customers. It isn't companies that try to restrict smoking or alcohol sales, if it was up to them they'd sell alcohol and cigarettes to kids. In fac
89.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Nobody creates a good product they first time they try, but lots of people don't commercialize those failures and instead iterates until they have something they don't feel is shit so their first commercial release becomes a succe
90.
▲
by
username90
5y ago
Depleting the aquifers doesn't benefit society. The minor value gained from exports doesn't weigh up that. Of course we need farmers, but we don't need farmers who do that.
More ›