4 ms·
You speculated about the motive of the harassers, not the actual chain of events. Nothing you say here says that the harassers attacked her for being a woman in
by username90 5y ago
You speculated about the motive of the harassers, not the actual chain of events. Nothing you say here says that the harassers attacked her for being a woman instead of attacking her for cheating the game review system.
- crooked-v 5y agoShe didn't cheat the game review system.
- username90 5y agoI didn't say she did. Hate mobs can attack people for things that aren't true, happens all the time. There is a reason why we don't use hate mobs in the justice system. For example, lets say a twitter mob attacks a man for something he didn't do. Is that misandry? No, they did it thinking he actually did it.
- stale2002 5y agoI don't see what the big deal is that you keep bringing. Why does it matter so much to you whether or not 60%, or 59% of the people engaging in the harassment were sexist? It is still bad, regardless if we get the literal exact percentage correctly of precisely how sexist each individual was.
- input_sh 5y agoI didn't speculate shit, I read those threads as they were happening. You know what they've boiled down to? She was a woman (with a couple of feminist takes), this dude made allegations against her, therefore let's doxx her. > instead of attacking her for cheating the game review system. Again, he never reviewed any of her games, so unless your argument is that no game journalist should ever date any game developer under any circumstances, what system was she cheating exactly?
- username90 5y agoYou put way too much credit in the intelligence of hate mobs. People attack others for nonsense all the time. And I don't view gender bias as misogyny. Women are biased to believe women and men are biased to believe men, that is just natural. So men accusing women leads to male hate mobs, and women accusing men leads to female hate mobs. Of course male hate mobs are usually more vicious, but the workings are the same.