useriousbro

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   you are right the guardian is only a half decent news source, its also half shit. >Let me be more specific then, in the Guardian reporting we don't only hear from the defence lawyer - we hear the judge's response:. from the gua
2. 2.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   And I am asking.. does this look like one of those situations and do you think there is appropriate oversight in this situation? our shock I guess is that we don't think that there is scrutiny and that these ends do not justify these m
3. 3.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   I like to grab my state propaganda from the BBC, so i visit it a few times a day.. ive not seen anything about the assange hearing there at all.. so why do you expect to hear about the details of his complaints there.. i mean why is this th
4. 4.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   My understanding of the above link: The accusation that police changed the statement from the witness may be false or even deliberately exaggerated. Not extactly that he is blanket full of shit or did i miss something? But Nils onky asked S
5. 5.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   Thanks for the link. I agree he has his own motivations etc. And was already taking his info with a pinch of salt. It still looks to me like some of the major elements dont add up, like the release of info to the police, the dropping of the
6. 6.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   okay, so giving him 50 weeks (i think it was) in maximum security for a crime that normally gets a fine. holding him in solitary confinement (against human rights act) and not allowing him to meet with his lawyers/solicitors is how it
7. 7.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   Are you saying that the targets referenced in this article/hearing were clear and immediate threat to Americans on the other side of the world? or maybe they were minutes from launching a nuke? Also do you think its correct to investig
8. 8.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   a) doesn't really seem a fair representation: UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer, speaks in detail about the explosive findings of his investigation into the case of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.: https://www.
9. 9.▲
   by useriousbro 6y ago

   Or questioning whether the status quo is a good thing? You think there are not enough competent people out there for us to avoid conflicts of interest? As for complying with extradition requests is this sort of abuse of power not the kind o
10. 10.▲
    by useriousbro 6y ago

    Just curious what ends you think justify these means? and do you think the US (and other 5 eyes) is achieving those ends?