user43928

9 ms·

181.
by user43928 2mo ago
I do not think I'd personally gain much currently, other than saving a few dollars by using a third party inference provider. The Fable quota on the $200 personal plan could be higher, but the difference to Opus 5 or 5.6 Sol is not lar
182.
by user43928 2mo ago
Interesting, I was not aware of SBF's investment in Anthropic. It's not a good look. If you ask me, SBF ran an obvious scam in a sector that is as a whole a scam. With Anthropic's product, I experience a real benefit today.
183.
by user43928 2mo ago
Isn't the fear mongering and position on regulation consistent with the beliefs he shares about the dangers of AI and how frontier models must be developed and deployed in a safe way? I see the conflict of interest of course, but so fa
184.
by user43928 2mo ago
I think it's bad. You want to handle device rotation smoothly in your in-app browser? Tough luck, WebKit's _beginAnimatedResizeWithUpdates is private, and only Apple gets to use it in Safari. Good luck with the animation and scrol
185.
by user43928 2mo ago
If you're so familiar with Amodei's history, why don't you share what concretely you object to?
186.
by user43928 2mo ago
And is there any evidence that suggests such flawed character? I am not familiar with Amodei's personal history, but I generally do not assume the worst of people just because they are extremely successful, like many others here seem t
187.
by user43928 2mo ago
Pathetic discourse in the comments for the most part. As if we didn't know the challenges in translating research into clinical treatments. I wonder if many of the commenters here read the post, where Amodei specifically references his
188.
by user43928 2mo ago
I don't see a lot of societal level problems other than the labor market, for which both Anthropic and OpenAI create research, monitoring, and policy advice. I don't think anyone will care about the largely made up issues about el
189.
by user43928 2mo ago
Do you not think that Amodei, who worked on research about cancer biomarkers at Stanford, knows a thing or two about how to apply AI to the problem? What he is saying makes sense to me. Is it that you don't trust a single word he says
190.
by user43928 2mo ago
In this context that probably relates to reducing permissions of the coding agent. That might be a tradeoff in convenience which one has to assess against the risk. And for that risk assessment, it seems that coding agents with broad permis
191.
by user43928 2mo ago
Based on my experience, a competent business person could feasibly develop a mobile app today. However, I suspect that trying this in a team, where developers review the code, is likely a recipe for disaster. About the natural-language comp
192.
by user43928 2mo ago
It's still a lot of work. I have to prompt for the features, test them, then iterate until the UX is acceptable before I merge. Usually I would juggle 2-5 topics in parallel, unless one of them demands more of my attention. While there
193.
by user43928 2mo ago
> the one hand, agents have enabled you to build a bullet-proof high quality app in a few months as a solo dev. On the other hand it's supposedly unreasonable to expect a team of engineers with lots of funding and lots of expertise
194.
by user43928 2mo ago
While technically allowed, Apple's terms are extensive: https://developer.apple.com/support/alternative-browser-engi...
195.
by user43928 2mo ago
Don't you think I've fixed bugs and kept the app stable during the 300 hours I have been working on it? That's why I can say with full confidence that it works. I doubt it will magically all fall apart the moment an external
196.
by user43928 2mo ago
I doubt that. I believe many of you use it at work, where you need to get code through review, or voluntarily review the generated code. Otherwise I have no explanation as to how agentic development is failing for you, while it continues to
197.
by user43928 2mo ago
You can generalize an incident where Opus 4.6 acted on the user's prompt in a harmful way to indicate prompt injection risk, since presumably the system prompt was bypassed, ok. It's still not a good basis to claim the problem of
198.
by user43928 2mo ago
By that standard, we could have AGI tomorrow, and I should still not comment. No, my app is not published yet. It will probably take another month, with hopefully no complications arising out of the AppStore review process. Then, I hope the
199.
by user43928 2mo ago
I am here to discuss my opinions on AI for software development because it's interesting. Not because I am selling a book or to prove anything to you. If I had any special approach, I would be reluctant to share it with my potential co
200.
by user43928 2mo ago
I did not try it on games. Many features in my iOS app at first come out technically working, but with poor UX and verbose text in the UI. One or two rounds of testing and refinement and they typically work well.
201.
by user43928 2mo ago
And when do you expect my approach will stop to work? The core features are complete and the codebase is already sizable. I will not publish my app on GitHub for free. It's a paid app, and I am putting in the hours not for your approva
202.
by user43928 2mo ago
Alignment of the latest models is questionable, yes. That's a different topic. For this particular gym incident, supposedly Opus 4.6 was used in OpenClaw, predating the current safety guardrails of Fable and co.
203.
by user43928 2mo ago
Very well, in my opinion, if you look at OpenAI's and Anthropic's mission statements, labor market impact research, and extensive talks on the matter.
204.
by user43928 2mo ago
I've been working on the app for four months, and I am clearly not talking about code quality. I am talking about product quality and maintainability. Both are more than adequate. I know this because I have worked on it for an estimate
205.
by user43928 2mo ago
The article says what many here like to hear, but in my opinion the core arguments are false. > Making software debuggable, maintainable, layered, and composable – that’s still quite a trick Not really. I have been working on a mobile ap
206.
by user43928 2mo ago
What if it does not develop wishes at all and sticks to the values the labs try to instill it with during training?
207.
by user43928 2mo ago
Claude Desktop also contains Claude Code that you need to select specifically over the default or Cowork. I would refer to it as Claude app vs Claude (Code) CLI. The app has a context wheel on the right of the chat box, showing both current
208.
by user43928 2mo ago
That's what is shown by default in the app. I'll never understand why anyone would want to restrict themselves to a terminal interface instead, and I say this as a Vim user.
209.
by user43928 2mo ago
I doubt there is such a clear difference. One week it feels better to work with Fable and Opus 5, the other I work more with GPT 5.6 Sol. Either takes its liberties, and neither communicates like a companion.
210.
by user43928 2mo ago
With GPT 5.6 Luna the thinking once or twice leaked into the output for me. It's interesting, but perhaps not particularly useful. It would be endless paragraphs of something among the lines of: Need prepare final response? Yes provide

More ›