useless999

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by useless999 3y ago

   Author writes about useful easing concept, happens to use UI element purely for illustrative purposes, HN comment section turns into a 100+ comment jihad over animations in GUIs. Nothing substantial is discussed.
2. 2.▲
   by useless999 3y ago

   I’m afraid conspicuous consumption predates consumerism by a few millenia :(
3. 3.▲
   by useless999 3y ago

   weather != climate
4. 4.▲
   by useless999 3y ago

   Yes, and absence of edvidence is not edvidence of absence. Which is why you need to posit a causal mechanism. To say current climate models are overly narrowing the problem domain as to exclude purely natural factors (assuming humanity is n
5. 5.▲
   by useless999 3y ago

   > I posit that any deliberate misinformation by the oil and gas lobby can and will be equally matched by deliberate misinformation by the wind and solar lobby. There's no reason to believe that the former is composed of evil people