usea

8 ms·

31.
by usea 2y ago
Even 8 years ago that was a safe view to hold.
32.
by usea 2y ago
> I suspect the primary issue is that there are simply way less people willing to work as letter carriers. A family member of mine works for the post office in their city. They don't have trouble hiring for any positions. There is a
33.
by usea 2y ago
If the only thing stopping them from decrypting your messages is instructions to their own employees to not allow it to be done, that is not a defense against providing access to law enforcement. They can just change those instructions at a
34.
by usea 2y ago
> The freedom to deny the freedom of another person is not a freedom worth discussing. If that was true, you wouldn't be doing just that.
35.
by usea 2y ago
> No single person will ever willingly consent to having their personal photos used to benefit a money grabbing company like Meta, or any company for that matter. I'm pretty against big money-grabbing companies as you put it, but I&
36.
by usea 2y ago
I've never seen such systems emerge from the team as a tool for self-empowerment. They are always foisted upon the team by managers who are trying to, ultimately, turn estimates into promises.
37.
by usea 2y ago
> CTOs see productivity multipliers The CTOs are hallucinating as much as the LLMs are.
38.
by usea 2y ago
If a breach is so inevitable like you say, then it's negligent to store the information in the first place. They're accumulating and organizing data with the inescapable conclusion of handing it out to criminal organizations.
39.
by usea 2y ago
My experience at companies is that the vast majority of the code is not understood by anybody working there, nor even attempted to be. It sits in third party libraries that nobody audits. That's a very bad thing, but this sounds like j
40.
by usea 2y ago
Many services will happily remove the authenticator from your account if you email them and say you lost it. The whole thing is a joke.
41.
by usea 2y ago
It absolutely could. It just doesn't. For reasons.
42.
by usea 2y ago
Create react app.
43.
by usea 2y ago
> What would I get using a web client like Phanpy? You can use it in a browser.
44.
by usea 2y ago
It's a popup that shows immediately upon visiting your link: https://i.imgur.com/uZEyE0Y.png
45.
by usea 3y ago
This is just another way of saying you're under-staffed so owners can capture more of the value of your labor. It's neither virtuous nor effective.
46.
by usea 3y ago
Because school is important and not at all irrelevant.
47.
by usea 3y ago
Google can spend a lot of money on it, and still be non-compliant. How much time has been spent on it, or how seriously it's being taken, is not really indicative of anything relevant.
48.
by usea 3y ago
> disingenuous argument to smear me like I am stupid I don't know what this is about. My post has nothing like that. The thing I disagree with is that you think being an American gives you the unique privilege to weigh in on the mat
49.
by usea 3y ago
> That's not at all what I talked about wondering about: You did talk about wondering about it: > I sometimes wonder how many American children get born while one of their parents is in service.
50.
by usea 3y ago
As a first approximation from a quick google search, approximately 2.75% of US children are born to one or more parents who are in the military. This was not hard information to find, but I can't vouch for its veracity; the language us
51.
by usea 3y ago
Because the decision isn't made for the benefit of the business. It's made for the benefit of individuals; either management, their friends/families, or investors. At the expense of shareholders and employees.
52.
by usea 3y ago
> they’d be in a world of hurt if they didn’t respond to a legitimate call How do you figure? There are no consequences for them, and not responding to legitimate calls is ubiquitous. If there were consequences, they would be suffering t
53.
by usea 3y ago
They killed people for money. They will get away with it because the managerial class is generally not held responsible for their actions. One legal system is not immune from criticism just because worse ones exist.
54.
by usea 3y ago
Is that how you judge others' words? By what accomplishments they have?
55.
by usea 3y ago
Apple isn't forced to host anything. Console manufacturers shouldn't be allowed to extract those fees either.
56.
by usea 3y ago
Yes, you can generally name things whatever you want. Champagne is a notable exception. The absurdity of this exception is not lost on people.
57.
by usea 3y ago
Incompetence is the most likely explanation.
58.
by usea 3y ago
> I mean, in many cases that’s grounds for dismissal and legitimately the job of a manager. It seems like the NLRB disagrees with you.
59.
by usea 3y ago
When my wife was in business school, the teacher of her management class used this idea as an unironic definition of management. They had to memorize the definition, which was essentially "taking credit for the work of other people.&qu
60.
by usea 3y ago
For many people it is. They cannot see another doctor if they want to continue doing things like eating food. If they're lucky enough to be insured at all.

More ›