Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
usaar333
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
73 ms
·
781.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
That's a great point and something pxx numbers often miss. Zanzibar almost certainly has this type of behavior. More complex ACL structures under recent evaluations perform worse. I'd love to see percentile data for depth of oper
782.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Well even more broadly it is how generalizable it is, while still providing ordering guarantees (though not necessarily perfect ones.. see my long sibling post) Using Windows style ACEs for ACLs is also perfectly scalable and consistent, (a
783.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
GP means ordering with respect to time for snapshot reads, which is essential for correctness. (You might be thinking of ordering ACEs in the ACL which isn't even a concept in Zanzibar)
784.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
The system is actually pretty complicated and nonobvious once you consider its caching layers, heavy reliance on spanner, assumption that ACL read times can be stale, and the various assumptions and limitations in the namespace controls. Th
785.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Excellent paper. As someone who has worked with filesystems and ACLs, but never touched Spanner before, I have some questions for any Googler who has played with Zanzibar. (in part because full-on client systems examples are limited) A chec
786.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
That's not entirely true. WeChat in many ways is more impressive than whatever US equivalent is for a Chinese audience. And Didi executed far better than Uber without protectionism being in play. It's nontrivial to execute in a
787.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Realistically, you'd walk the list with a visited set and validate you didn't visit a node twice. This would solve your problem in any realistic use case and you'd never even recognize a constant space solution was possible.
788.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
> San Francisco and LA are at 12,000 Small nit. SF is about 19k people per square mile. (Almost 900k people on 47 square miles of land)
789.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
> "If you can show you have ways of making progress when you are out of your depth then you aced the interview, even if you were nowhere near the correct solution." In my extensive experience on both sides of the interview tabl
790.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
What risk pools? They can generally only consider age and family structure. I'm mid 30s, married with a kid. I'm not following why this is a subsidy per se. I can deduct health insurance premiums from my self employment after all.
791.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Not in my experience. Equivalent plans (gold level) were maybe 10% more expensive than my employer plan (Cobra rates). Also what subsidy are you referring to? Could you cite some data?
792.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
That's been happening almost everywhere for the last half century. Plenty of places are below replacement population growth.
793.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
China has definitely done targeted hits. Did you forget the GitHub DDOS in 2015? https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/04/ddos-...
794.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
If the person returns home, they release the lien: http://www.nls.org/Disability/MedicaidMedicare/MedicaidLegal... Do all other OECD countries cover nursing homes for free until death? That's the case when li
795.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
The house equity? This is for people who are terminally ill; the costs are coming from the estate.
796.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Is there solid data out here that this is true? My COBRA premiums last year were quoted at a bit over $1700; a Gold PPO (a slightly better plan) on Covered CA goes for $1900. This is in the range of "not that different". What is
797.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
That's not a symptom of health care being a natural monopoly. That's a symptom of a lack of price transparency. 1. Laws can correct this. 2. A large segment of consumers paying out of pocket would also result in competitive pressu
798.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
So $1400/month needs to be raised? That's less than what my COBRA premiums were; sign me up!
799.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Only if you are permanently institutionalized is that a concern.
800.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Even parity with cash. Investing in tech (say vgt) has had 90% returns over the past three years.
801.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
They also care about wait times. And drivers care about utilization. "Taxi apps" definitely have network effects from the two sided market, though not as strong as a social network.
802.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
You might be thinking of ISOs. Ordinary income tax is due at exercise of a non qualified option (NQSO), which CA will tax. Same is true with RSU releases.
803.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Even if you move, California taxes subsequent NQSO exercises if the options vested while working on California.
804.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Is it worse than any other American suburb?
805.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
I'm not even sure how they calculate capital gain. If I do maintenance on my house, are the authors viewing that as raising the basis?
806.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Great paper, but lots of limitations. That they can't factor in taxes all that well ("Since quantifying the time- and country-varying effect of taxes on returns with precision is beyond the scope of this study, throughout this pap
807.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Per paper, it's 0.9% real capital gain return since 1950 in the US. That's smaller than the 1.9% real gdp per capita of the US since 1950, meaning people are actually spending a lower percentage of income toward housing. (mind you
808.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
> After I say something, I hear it pronounced back at me by a native speaker. I imagine that being sufficient is going to vary a lot by individual learning styles and ability to mimic. I'm guessing you are rather good at mimicking
809.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
> They need fully autonomous driving in order to achieve profitability. Why is this inherently true? Taxi services were profitable and Uber/Lyft are better than they ever were. I don't see why Uber/Lyft raising fares a bit
810.
▲
by
usaar333
7y ago
Agreed. By "people" above, I should have clarified "adults". The issue is that it is very difficult for adults to learn new phonemes (individual units of sound that distinguish words from each other) - an adult hearing
More ›