unyttigfjelltol

5 ms·

1.
by unyttigfjelltol 2mo ago
> It's immensely different. Leaps and bounds different. Why? [O]nce you have been told to unlock the device, you're already in a legally binding process. From a factual point of view, rather than the narrow legal one offered, i
2.
by unyttigfjelltol 5mo ago
Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran— all of them have both an armed force and weapons to fight with. Hamas in particular, instigated the hot conflict that started Oct. 7 2023, and prolonged it through hostage-taking and active participation in armed c
3.
by unyttigfjelltol 5mo ago
Hey, I’ve side loaded and F-Droided and all that. But here’s the thing: I just need the phone to work, minimally spy on me, and not turn into some horrible malware sinkhole. Google and their OEM ecosystem lost my confidence on all three cou
4.
by unyttigfjelltol 5mo ago
Security is essential for an appliance like a smart phone. I fight the general purpose computing battle on my desktop with Linux, but on my phone I just need something that won’t be hacked.
5.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
I disagree. They could fire Claude and their legal counsel could pursue claims (if there were any, idk)-- the accountability model is similar. Anthropic probably promised no particular outcome, but then what employee does? And in the revers
6.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
> journalists in media, classically inept at any economic analysis It’s just the NYT. Let’s not demean the rest of the media for the faults of the NYT.
7.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
Russian self-image is protector of the family of Slavic people and nations. Resorting openly to destruction of a Slavic people would be an incoherent tactic. That self-perception lowered the gate for interference in Ukrainian affairs in the
8.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
Weak gameplay. It’s a turn-by-turn war strategy game where all the levers are “Go on FOX and friends”. What’s particularly strange is how backward the critique is. How about this— for your encore, write the same game from the IRGC perspecti
9.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
> play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Yeah, the game Iran is now trying to play is called “Pipelines and Pirates”. There’s actually a ship deployed to the region right now named after the standard US response to this game, the USS Trip
10.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
> Iran didn't escalate against anyone except their aggressors. This is categorically false. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Qatar, (Kuwait,) even Oman and Turkey at various times, and Cyprus. Iran demonstrated superiority in only one respe
11.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
It's obviously a problem with efficiency, resources and incentives. Earlier court dates is reshuffling deck chairs on the titanic, basically after the ship sank. Since the problem is about labs and technology , and that the state l
12.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
If you start with the view that Israel has a right to exist, like Kuwait has a right to exist, what common ground then is possible with the IRGC? Did Saddam Hussein think it was a winning strategy to lecture the world about Kuwaitis pulling
13.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
Trump’s bargaining position has been: stop raising foreign armies to attack Israel; stop trying to sneak into the nuclear club, because we know what you’re going to do. Translated to human terms: stop threatening the US and its allies. The
14.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
Iran has for nearly fifty years pursued unilateral hostilities against the US and Israel, including funding numerous terrorist groups and militias to wage war on them. It can’t negotiate its way out of this quagmire because the IRGC’s cor
15.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
The weird thing is some of the capabilities of these different Copilots are completely different, even though presented in the same way. The real pain begins when you assume consistent handling of links to objects in M365. It’s far less int
16.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
AI can take a rough draft, clean it up and shorten it as much as you want. The suggestions very often expose ambiguities in the original text. If you think the LLM got it wrong, it’s nearly often the LLM overreading some feature of the or
17.
by unyttigfjelltol 6mo ago
It’s more like “strike one,” and sets up a clear standard for what happens if this continues, as it did in another well-known case.[1] [1] https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/facebook-agrees-pay-...
18.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
I think you’re just seeing the logic of US defense by offense, and the reason why the excursion was launched as it was three weeks ago. If you step back, in 1979 Iran launched a revolution that had an avowed goal of “death to America”. If t
19.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
1. By a show of hands, who was surprised that the cataclysmic warnings of the weekend subsided into talk of diplomacy on Monday? 2. Let’s hypothesize the US gov’t or allies did pre-release this info to traders as a policy tool, inviting t
20.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
Yeah, I was recalling public references to Husayn ibn Ali (Haider) [1] preparing for battle. This individual is revered for both martyrdom and victory, so I guess which one he had in mind is technically ambiguous…. It’s also the same figu
21.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
Folks, the President announced the attack and rough date ten days in advance.[1] He did the same exact thing in 2025, with strikes beginning on the 61st day after a 60-day deadline.[2] This particular market wasn’t about the likelihood of a
22.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
No, Trump manufactured negotiating leverage out of thin air— nothing, really. He extracted concessions on something like a bluff. Plus, didn’t he also extract a budget that in retrospect wasn’t appropriate had the tariff revenue been remove
23.
by unyttigfjelltol 7mo ago
This says OpenAI is happy with the law and DoW policy, and thinks those protections are adequate. In contrast, Anthropic seems to have imposed additional contractual guardrails, blocking apparently legal DoW use cases. Was it a subtly dif
24.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
Techno futurist: 1. Builds tool extremely capable of mass surveillance and running autonomous warfighting capabilities. 2. Expresses shock — shock — when the Department of War insists on using the tool for mass surveillance and autonomous
25.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
The answer is to keep the same number of stops but run two or more vehicles simultaneously. Or open more doors. Or expedite fares. The authors get mixed up equating count of marked stops with dwell time. Running leapfrogging vehicles , or n
26.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
Is there a micropayment option or something? I wish I could friction-free, buy access to these sites al al carte without dealing with them directly or setting up a recurring subscription directly with them.
27.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
Contacting the authorities led the company to hire lawyers— for communication with the data protection authority. The lever lawyers have to “make it go away” is “law says so.” They’re not going to beg for mercy, they’re not going to invite
28.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
Worse things in the world than retrospective bipartisanship.
29.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
> in the context of Persian … "marg bar Aamrikaa". If you ask the default/free model on ChatGPT to translate, it will simply tell you it means 'Death to America'. It won't tell you "marg bar ..." i
30.
by unyttigfjelltol 8mo ago
I spent several years trying to get ground truth out of digital medical records and I would draw this parallel to AI slop: With traditional medical records, you could see what the practitioner did and covered because only that was in th

More ›