unshavedyak

6 ms·

61.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
Skills are effectively the same thing as asking it, just with more depth. So the skill is just a framework for a very precisely asked question. It often includes how you want Claude to respond, etc. I’m not aware of anything fundamentally u
62.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
Exactly. Ironically i'm probably a better dev purely because after a few experiences on SO, I would rather waste days/weeks banging my head against problems and learning from them than to actually post on SO. It was a miserable ex
63.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
That's fair, neither am i - i do tend to work in large, complex, full of legacy decision based codebases. Eg i have access to Sonnet (of course), but i choose to solely work in Opus because i find its output reads better, analyzes bett
64.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
This is fair, but i've found the different models to have different moods and require different interactions to get them to stick to just the specific edits i ask for, etc. I used to surf the three big players frequently and got really
65.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
It's pretty funny, i'm a $200/m Claude subscriber and i've had little need to use anything else. However the more Claude has been restricting my workflow (notably around the recent IDE/-p usage change) the more i&
66.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
> I would do the same but my issue is that the models are changing so fast, so I don't want to be left out of the next model cuz it only runs on an even newer GPU or something like that. I think the same, and it's why i stopped
67.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
I do, though they're not as bullet proof as you'd hope to my understanding. Hell i have one at the house level too - since i have an EV sitting behind that as well.
68.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
Yea, but i don't consider them good enough. I barely consider SOTA good enough. I'm hoping that by the time the rugpull happens with SOTA (claude/etc) that at-home will be in the 4.7-5.5 range? We'll see.
69.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
Yup. I was really close to buying $1000 (at $1) worth of BTC ages ago. I don't dwell because the stress of managing that through time would have eaten me away lol. With that said, i do regret not at least mining/etc. Back then i c
70.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
I am eagerly awaiting being able to run a strong local model. I'd hand Apple $5k right now for a Claude in a box. I know the cost might not be there now, just saying that is around my ideal price point. $10k might even be worth it - bu
71.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
Typically i use more than the 10x plan, i maybe use around 50% of normal, interactive usage. Though because i have a sub i then try to work extra and /loop some to make use of my money. I use a simple home grown (all claude built lol)
72.
by unshavedyak 5mo ago
$2k/m[1] is not something i could stomache for the quality i get from Claude Code, personally. I'm curious what your base number is for your 10x figure. [1]: 10x my $200/m bill
73.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
What do you use it for? I tend to just stick to SOTA (Claude 4.7 Max thinking), and put up with the slow req/response. I'm not sure what type of work i'd trust a less thinking model, as my intuition is built around what Claud
74.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
> It would be great if it supported more commands though! What does it not support? I want to try and figure out if its shortcomings in the ACP/Claude SDK or if it's just features that Zed has yet to support?
75.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
I find it so funny that many of these harnesses sound like black magic and are completely mystical to me. I use Claude Code every day and yet i can't imagine the workflow of Pi. I also don't care to pay API rates just to experimen
76.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
I agree with you, BUT, we have licensing right? Ie couldn't the author have chosen a license that would have prevented this - if they had cared? I'm unsure if we should lose sleep over something the author likely chose. Its their
77.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Heck, unless AI gets absurdly cheap - i feel like even this will be temporary. To your point, we don't do that now because it's not fun and no one broadly finances this sort of thing. However AI costs money, so why are we spending
78.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Shame that we have to choose between better financing of Blender for features we already want (Python API quality) and placating imo overly dramatic artists.
79.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
You still assume the artist in those examples is real. It could be a team, a ghost artist, etc - yea it's less likely than music, but still. The connection itself is quite difficult too, given the ease in which someone could plagiarize
80.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
It's something strange because i never have these issues. I often run two in parallel (though not all day), and generally have something running anytime i look at my laptop to advance the steps/tasks/etc. Usually i struggle t
81.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
That's correct, though you'll still end up needing more than AST/LSP/etc for the same reason AST/LSP/etc isn't enough for me (the human lol), ie comments/docs/etc.
82.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
I actually still like LLMs for this. I use rust LSP (rust analyzer) and it supports this, but LLMs will additionally go through and reword all of the documentation, doc links, comments, var names in other funcs in one go, etc. Are they perf
83.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
This is interesting, can you link any more details on it?
84.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Part of me wonders if there's some subtle behavioral change with it too. Early on we're distrusting of a model and so we're blown away, we were giving it more details to compensate for assumed inability, but the model outperf
85.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
You're not, it wasn't released yet. Update to 111 and you'll see it (i'm on Max20, i do) Heck, mine just automatically set it to 4.7 and xhigh effort (also a new feature?)
86.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Sounds like it was added as of .111, so update and it might work?
87.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
You're implying that Claude's SDK is a native ACP implementation?
88.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Possibly, though at first i was entirely focusing (and still am) on Claude Code usage. Given that CC had an API, i figured its own SDK would update faster/better/etc to new Claude features that Anthropic introduces. I'm sure
89.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Maybe they were accounting for huge layers of red tape in large orgs. God knows those are far slower than "competent programmers" lol
90.
by unshavedyak 6mo ago
Wait we can't use claude -p around other tools? What is the point of the JSON SDK then? Anthropic is confusing here, ugh. edit : And specifically i'm making an IDE, and trying to get ClaudeCode into it. I frankly have no clue whe

More ›