unshavedyak

7 ms·

91.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
To be clear i agree with you, my question is more pointed at us - i'm not sure we have a good understanding of conciousness, nor that we are as we seem. Given how prone to hallucinations we are, how our subtle hormones can drastically
92.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
I see this statement all the time and it's just strange to me. Yes, the LLMs struggle to form unique ideas - but so do we. Most advancements in human history are incremental. Built on the shoulders of millions of other incremental adva
93.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Yup, this is why i firmly believe true productivity, as in, it aiding you to make you faster, is limited by the speed of review. I think Claude makes me faster, but the struggle is always centered around retaining own context and reviewing
94.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Yup, that's totally possible, but you still have to approve the script. But that's a bit of a moot point right? Claude is writing code, nearly anything is possible with code, ergo claude could do anything lol.
95.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Not sure about OPs impl, but the wording doesn’t matter. The hook prevents the use of whatever action you want. Eg it’s impossible for Claude to use Emojis for me. My hook doesn’t allow it. So it’s deterministic based upon however the scrip
96.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Claude itself will grep through old conversations so it’s handy that Claude understands too
97.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Honestly seems like a supportive argument. Yea, your amendment clearly shows Apple isn't always right/late, but Vision Pro is an example of them being early and how far they miss when they're early hah. (I don't have a
98.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
> The problem isn’t the SDK but the API usage. Yes, i completely agree - which was my question. To my understanding OC was using CC API directly instead of using the SDK. My question is, why? Does the SDK prevent some functionality they
99.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
Anyone know why OpenCode is integrating to ClaudeCode in the manner they were? Ie CC gives you an SDK, and i get the impression that Anthropic is fine with you using whatever external tools you want with the SDK .. otherwise why'd they
100.
by unshavedyak 7mo ago
I'll be more likely to agree with anything being AGI if it doesn't have such obvious and common brittleness. These LLMs all go off the rails when the context window gets large. Their context is also easy to "poison", and
101.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
> For a person (senior or otherwise) to examine code or configuration with the granularity required to verify that it even approximates the result of their own level of experience, even only in terms of security/stability/corre
102.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
I don’t get this tbh, I use Claude too and my issue is the opposite - too many small breaks. Every time I hit enter my brain wants to checkout because the agent just spins while it creates thousands of tokens and churns on the subject. Even
103.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
Fwiw i used to do this (and with lints) - it was the only way to make Claude consistent in the early days when i first started using it (~August 2025). For many months now though, Claude is nearly consistent with both calling test and check
104.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
I imagine it's not the AI then, but the site font/css/something. Seeing as it looks fine for me (Brave, Linux).
105.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
Honestly, i'm not interested in this if it can't use my subscription, but now i really want to understand this idea of coding harness. I've been exploring ideas that might be quite similar, though more inline with the scope o
106.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
Would be neat if the call graph could be asserted easily.. As you could not only validate what vulnerabilities you are / aren't exposed to, but also choose to blacklist some API calls as a form of mitigation. Ensuring you don&#x27
107.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
I’ve been wanting similar but have instead been focused on GUI. My #1 issue with TUI is that I’ve never liked code jumps very smooth high fps fast scrolling. Between that and terminal lacking variable font sizes, I’d vastly prefer TUIs, but
108.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
Sidenote, i do that frequently. I also do varying levels of review, ie more/less vibe[1]. It is soul sucking to me. Despite being soul sucking, I do it because A: It lets me achieve goals despite lacking energy/time for projects t
109.
by unshavedyak 8mo ago
Is it common for graphics to be supported in the terminal? ASCII to me represents something that can work in my term, in my source code, checks into git a bit more sanely than binary does, etc. I still quite like it
110.
by unshavedyak 9mo ago
I mean.. i don't think that statement is far off. Much of what we do is entirely about predicting the world around us, no? Physics (where the ball will land) to emotional state of others based on our actions (theory of mind), we operat
111.
by unshavedyak 9mo ago
Yup, that's what my team does. It works wonderfully, and it fits well with Github's "large PR" mindset imo. It could be a bit better in the Github UI, but so can most things. I vastly prefer it to individually reviewing
112.
by unshavedyak 9mo ago
Does that happen on merge or before PR creation? I thought the setting only applied it when you hit the merge button, so you'd still have commits prior to the merge. Though that won't help if someone pre-squashes them :s
113.
by unshavedyak 10mo ago
My problem with those abstractions is: 1. That the error messages for them i find to be awful. They really need to take inspiration from Rust to help users know exactly where the API error is happening relative to your code . I've spe
114.
by unshavedyak 10mo ago
If that's the case i feel like we need some other term. As you're saying that someone who ignores 95% of the written code is not vibe coding. That to me says we need a term that describes "i ignored almost all code" type
115.
by unshavedyak 10mo ago
I agree, i'm saying any code it produces. Eg if you ignore 95% of the LLM's PR, are you vibe coding? Some would say no, because you read 5% of the PR. I would say yes, you are vibe coding. Ie you could say you vibe'd 95% of t
116.
by unshavedyak 10mo ago
> There probably needs to be some settled discussion on what constitutes "vibe coding." I interpret this term as "I input text into $AI_MODEL, I look at the app to see my change was implemented. I iterate via text prompts
117.
by unshavedyak 11mo ago
Wish i could remember my issues with jj. I tried it, i wanted to stick with it because i loved the fact that i could reorder commits while deferring the actual conflicts.. but something eventually prevented me from switching. Searching my s
118.
by unshavedyak 11mo ago
The rope in my example is complexity. Ie choosing to use "all teh features" when you don't need or perhaps even want to. Eg sometimes a simple clone is fine. Sometimes you don't need to opt for every generic and performa
119.
by unshavedyak 11mo ago
Rust is hard in that it gives you a ton of rope to hang yourself with, and some people are just hell bent on hanging themselves. I find Rust quite easy most of the time. I enjoy the hell out of it and generally write Rust not too different
120.
by unshavedyak 11mo ago
I think their skills have the ability to dynamically pull in more data, but so far i've not tested it to much since it seems more tailored towards specific actions. Ie converting a PDF might translate nicely to the Agent pulling in the

More ›