unreal37

9 ms·

61.
by unreal37 3y ago
If you attempt to use a credit card that you haven't used in years, the bank will similarly ask you to verify your identity. I don't think it's weird that unused valuable accounts need re-identification when you start to use
62.
by unreal37 3y ago
Elon Musk would love Twitter to be profitable and Steve Hoffman would love the same for Reddit.
63.
by unreal37 3y ago
Twitter and Reddit are messageboards. Like Hacker News. Every time they do something controversial, someone thinks Usenet needs to be reincarnated. Trying to monetize that at scale is hardddd. Facebook has got groups, yes. But they have ins
64.
by unreal37 3y ago
And he was willing to pay for access. His argument is that the price far exceeds their cost and, with 30 days notice, that's unreasonable. I take him at his word that he was willing to pay a reasonable amount. Again, Reddit has the rig
65.
by unreal37 3y ago
I don't understand your hostility, sorry. He has 50,000 customers who paid $10/year for the app. Now he's put into a position to support those customers at $2.50/month. (He estimates their server cost is $0.10 per month.
66.
by unreal37 3y ago
Nobody made money on Usenet. It was a "cost" for all ISPs and eventually Google. So maybe that's why it failed.
67.
by unreal37 3y ago
Is that illegal? I don't see how you can sue someone over "discrimination based on phone manufacturer".
68.
by unreal37 3y ago
DNS records take a minute to update and take 24-48 hours to propogate to all nodes globally due to caching. [0] https://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx...
69.
by unreal37 3y ago
I acknowledged in my comment that even if the most charitable explanation was assumed, the method of accounting is misleading and makes determining the cost of anything impossible.
70.
by unreal37 3y ago
"when the contractors allocated their engineering expenses among the individual spare parts on the list... they simply treated every item the same" Sounds like an extra hammer would have cost an $15+$420=$435. Anyways, we'll
71.
by unreal37 3y ago
The so-called "real" explanation of the $600 hammer doesn't make the story any better. The hammer did indeed cost $435. If the government wanted to buy another one, the contractor would have charged them an extra $435. Just b
72.
by unreal37 3y ago
That's quite an extreme set of statements, and I very much doubt what you consider "illegal" is actually illegal. When you publish something for others to view (text, images, code, whatever), others are allowed to view it. Yo
73.
by unreal37 3y ago
I don't understand why people just automatically doubt things that companies say when they can be sued (or would otherwise destroy their business) if they are lying about it. Seems unnecessarily pessimistic.
74.
by unreal37 3y ago
>> I asked it what my most cited paper is You asked a machine learning model to tell you something about yourself that you already knew?
75.
by unreal37 4y ago
The wifi allowed her helpers to monitor her by camera. She didn't have anything other than books.
76.
by unreal37 4y ago
The changing demographics is what causes the retirement age to be increased. In the 1960's, the average lifespan was in the 60s. So a retirement age of 65 meant that around half of retirees would die before collecting retirement. Now t
77.
by unreal37 4y ago
Having a bad day? I hope it gets better.
78.
by unreal37 4y ago
I don't know if there is a concept in copyright that prevents someone from viewing your work. Like, if you created a lovely piece of art, hung it on the outside of your house, and I was walking on the sidewalk and viewed it. I would no
79.
by unreal37 4y ago
There will be open source tools replicating this within months. You can build your own model based on billions of images on the web or use someone else's or contribute to one.
80.
by unreal37 4y ago
Someone was able to replicate GPT 3.5 with $500. The training of models is getting very cheap. [1] https://newatlas.com/technology/stanford-alpaca-cheap-gpt/
81.
by unreal37 4y ago
Nobody owes creators who have been paid fully for their work "extra" compensation just because AI is involved. Assuming they have been paid, the work belongs to Adobe.
82.
by unreal37 4y ago
It's not a wildcat strike if you're not in a union. It's just refusing to show up to work.
83.
by unreal37 4y ago
Asking ChatGPT to explain the reason it gave an answer is a thing.
84.
by unreal37 4y ago
Probably she is associated with that firm on LinkedIn... It's not easy to imagine how someone gets a database of photos of employees of a law firm. I'd bet she self-identified as being an employee and posted to social media about
85.
by unreal37 4y ago
Hooters hires "performers", not waitresses. So this is indeed how it works.
86.
by unreal37 4y ago
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/14/microsoft-ai-leaps-ahead-her... "GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke recently told us that Copilot is now handling up to 40% of coding among programmers using the AI in the beta test
87.
by unreal37 4y ago
ChatGPT, in it's current form, will change the way I work. I can see it. And in the future? Holy moly. I can't wait. Can you believe there were tech people learning about the Intel 8086 for the first time in 1977 and saying "
88.
by unreal37 4y ago
We're moving to a world where almost all code written will be AI assisted. Think about that. From 10 years ago, almost all code was written by humans. Today, 50% of code is assisted by AI. In 10 years? Humans will not be writing code b
89.
by unreal37 4y ago
There are ML companies that monitor call center conversations and recommend what to say to the agent. "ALERT! The customer just mentioned how long it takes to download files. Recommend a faster internet package."
90.
by unreal37 4y ago
"it’s able to understand the Python code and come to the correct answer" That's not what is happening. Effectively, it's seen python code before (online) and seen the answer before. There's no understanding. As a pr

More ›