Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
unityByFreedom
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
167 ms
·
1711.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> the levels describe modes of operation, not immutable car classifications Look at the column where human attention is required ("Monitoring of Driving Environment"). Every car in existence requires human monitoring in every
1712.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> So basically by your definition, level 5 will never ever happen? Seems a bit useless then TBH. Well, even trains on tracks have humans ready to pull the break if something is wrong up ahead. Would you ride a train that had an accident
1713.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> But that doesn't actually contradict stale2002 stale2002 said the article is talking about level 5, and that level 4 is around the corner. Yet the article is talking about level 5, 4, and below. It is saying some car companies
1714.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> There have been more than just the one fatality. I know of at least one other, but who knows if that's the extent. And there have probably been plenty of crashes and injuries. Yup. The Tesla accident in Hong Kong (or Heibei provi
1715.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> Pratt is clearly talking about the difference between Level 4 and Level 5 in his first two answers No, Pratt is saying that manufacturers are hyping level 4 as being around the corner, but it is not. Pratt does not think the claims fo
1716.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> If you removed Tesla from the equation, Level 4 autonomy would be half a decade away... it's pretty sad how far behind the industry is from this perennially cash strapped upstart. This is simply untrue. Volvo will have a release
1717.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> That is genuinely insightful, and is most certainly a political problem to address. Why is that a political problem?
1718.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> level 4 really is right around the corner I disagree. Level 4 does not require driver attention. That is still a long way off. From Wikipedia [1]: Level 4: The automated system can control the vehicle in all but a few environments su
1719.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
OMG that video. I thought people learned their lesson after the FL man's death. The culture is even worse now! Cars led to more deaths than people had on horseback. I'm starting to feel autonomous vehicles will be the same sort
1720.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> As someone from mainland China and learned pinyin in grade 1 of primary school, which happened in early 90s, in Beijing, I use pinyin daily, for inputting Chinese into electronic devices. Do you think learning Pinyin first threw off yo
1721.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> Is the fact that private companies do the tracking supposed to make me feel better? YES!! A government has much more power than a company operating under it, particularly in a single-party state.
1722.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
Thanks. I mention it because, as a tech enthusiast, I was once very much in the camp of "we should know everything our government does" Now, I understand that "we can't know everything, because some other governments wo
1723.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
That article [1] is intense. "all true Christians must vote for Trump." "Faith Trumps Politics for Faithful People" "Put self aside and fight for Trump to help stop the forces of evil from prevailing" "Tru
1724.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> it's best to ignore that topic altogether until at least it falls off the news cycle I think it's unfortunate when people stop talking about the issues. You're right, people may have made up their minds, but the debate
1725.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> Hmm. Now I can't tell if your reply is serious :p I am, it is.. > As near as I can tell, the political process converts ideas from logical propositions into group signaling devices. Once a idea becomes a signal, any question of
1726.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> Or is that just a small price to pay to get your religious beliefs installed in the highest court in the land? I don't know why you were downvoted, but I would like to point out that many laws are based on religion, like marrying
1727.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> Realistically, what evidence do you have that Trump has any more likelihood of using a nuclear bomb against the wishes of congress than Hillary? Has he shown an inclination towards mass murder in other scenarios? Trump reportedly asked
1728.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
>> He will likely increase tensions on the world stage. > While Trumps opponent openly warns Russia of consequences. Lets be objective now. Yes, let's. Russia is not an ally. There are consequences to its aggression. Trump,
1729.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> 10 to 1 one you're wrong. https://xkcd.com/1132/ What are the two scenarios you're referring to? That Trump does or does not contribute to a nuclear war? Trump trashes everyone who disagrees with him.
1730.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> You make it sound illogical. > As a religious conservative, I do really want that supreme court seat. That factors heavily in the decision. Sorry, that's my bias seeping in. I respect your choice. > The President has to rea
1731.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> I think tech culture's misguided desire to treat everyone "equally" creates a huge imbalance. You can't put the NYTimes in the same category as Breitbart. Just as you wouldn't compare it to "National Enqui
1732.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
I think he's serious. This is the nationalist mindset. "Create more walls. Diversity is difficult." We all know what happens when we stop reaching across the divide. We go into our holes, there is miscommunication, and sm
1733.
▲
by
unityByFreedom
10y ago
> there should be "block designed" hiring around these issues to maximize political diversity and reduce bias in aggregate How do we deal with those who would push treasonous information? If WikiLeaks publishes correspondence