ungamedplayer

9 ms·

91.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I think you might be talking about different wake ups.
92.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I imagine quite a lot of people will be. There might be room for after market head unit replacement for these new models.
93.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Call it what it is.. they like the control of their in car entertainment systems and they don't want external companies taking that part of the pie. It's okay gm, we understand. Let's hope you are able to make a compelling c
94.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Why does this feel like the professor trying to either fix the problem or give detention.
95.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Talk about preparing graduates for the real world!
96.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I feel that contributing to these closed source extension hostile software never ends up benefiting anyone long term. I know people gotta make a buck though. Sucks.
97.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
> You can recognize them because hardware not commonly used with untrusted guests does not get a CVE. This is not true. Even non default configuration of any software or hardware that contains a security vulnerability can get a CVE. It
98.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Physical access not required. Dedupe side attack required timing measurement.
99.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
A dynamic document format outgrew it's use case as a document format. Programming separates out presentation and logic (html and JavaScript). This is a good thing. I'd like to see the separation to go further. Locking presentatio
100.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Oh got some hate there.. pissed off the zfs kids with a dose of reality. Dedupe can be used to infer secret data. .. more news at 11
101.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I think that was what op was saying. They will make the boring samish logos.
102.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
At redhat, we just maintain kpatch and hire kernel engineering to do the same. Turn around is about a week for 40 variants of kernel.
103.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Great channel for side attacks btw.
104.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I think when brew works nativelu it will be much more functional and fun to use.
105.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
There always will be, since reality trends toward degradation.
106.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
> If you surveyed the same number of developers to contribute to the project and they said no, would you make the same inference about all developers? I think This was not an assumption. You are stating a fact. I simply can't find
107.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
>AFAICT, people did that frequently on regular systems as well, just to not bother with permissions. This was an easy way to tell if you were dealing with a Muppet. If you saw this you would know that the software was going to be a prob
108.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Mac os users traditionally will pay for software. They have no shortage of products they can purchase that will be eol in the next+1 is version.
109.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
> FOSS would have so so many banging gold-standard user-facing apps if they enlisted the help of experienced UI or maybe UX designers . And here lies the rub. I have tried soliciting help in the past . Most ui UX ppl only want to work o
110.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Most people care about user facing code. Which is by and large most of the code. You get the option with open source. You do not get the option with closed. Cut, dried, dehydrated and delivered to your door.
111.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Mine still is shrug
112.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Gp visit is free. Often need doctor cert for work to take more than a day or two off.
113.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
I find that report itself a little strange. Most gp are not associated with hospitals (at least near me). So I wonder if that skews the statistics. I only go to the hospital when I'm having major surgery.
114.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Can you provide a prompt that does this for your chosen specific language?
115.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
At least you can fix the bug when you have the source.. not so much with iOS.
116.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Link to where this was said by rh?
117.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
The license never changed. What part went proprietary. Show me the license change.
118.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
Doesn't this theory apply to almost anyone with the capability to dual license. Which I thought was any project that had agreement from the original authors.
119.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
There definitely are nuances to licensing vs public perception.. what makes you say it is not adhering to its license? https://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
120.
by ungamedplayer 3y ago
This part stumped me too. Maybe op had some deployment issues on VM systems.

More ›