undo76

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by undo76 7y ago

   Reality is stubborn, isn't it?
2. 2.▲
   by undo76 11y ago

   I agree that maybe "trolling" is not the most accurate description. The author seems to be a competent coder, so I am assuming that he knows that such a solution for view components is flawed at least and that it would be a nightm
3. 3.▲
   by undo76 11y ago

   Stupid me. I missread the code and did a proof of concept in jsbin just adding "</script><script>alert('XSS');</script><script>" as a hobby. Now I realise that I added it in the HTML vie
4. 4.▲
   by undo76 11y ago

   Well, technically you don't need to know JSX, but it pays off to know it IMHO. Moreover, the DOM API is much more complicated than React API and the latest doesn't depend on the particular browser you are using. But yes, to use a
5. 5.▲
   by undo76 11y ago

   It is a misconception that you need a lot of configuration to start with React. The minimum setup requires just to import the React libs in your webpage and to transpile your code to ES5 using Babel in case you are using JSX/ES6 (recom
6. 6.▲
   by undo76 11y ago

   Am I the only one that thinks that the author is trolling? I mean, the final code has obvious flaws: a) Difficult to read and mantain. (Compare with the version below). b) Inefficient in a real world scenario as it has to recreate the DOM e