underslung

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   Ok. So what would constitute as hard/far left? Under your definitions' it seems like being a nationalist (believing in the nation-state and sovereignty) & white supremacy are synonymous — which obviously they are not, unless y
2. 2.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   fwiw I do not work at Google and I believe opting out of ad-tracking (via your Google account) is independent of general data analytics. The stronger fingerprinting technology becomes (whether browser and/or network based) the more irr
3. 3.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   ..yes.
4. 4.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   It's about consistency and intent -- these observations do not extend to conspiracy tier thinking. What is the primary purpose of the X-Client-Data header if not for some unplanned future-proofing? Masquerading about it does not add to
5. 5.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   Could this ruling have gone another way if it was done in a different state? e.g. California (just generally curious)
6. 6.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   >Calling work non-voluntary reveals more about the author than it does about the system they describe: that they feel that they have no choice. They have a choice, but the choice is unpleasant. That is not the same as no choice. Declarin
7. 7.▲
   by underslung 6y ago

   I think you've missed the point of the article. He is illustrating a society of post-capitalism where the emphasis on work is not to maintain ones' standard of life, but rather to "play" as he puts — a method of unlockin