underrated

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   I think you posted to the wrong site. This is completely out of bounds here.
2. 2.▲
   Ask HN: How do you decide how much hardware to assign to a project?

   1 points by underrated 12y ago|1 comments
3. 3.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   You can't compare upvote numbers (or even upvote/downvote ratios) meaningfully between sites, because their communities aren't the same. Your proposed scenario tells us nothing beyond pure numbers -- 100 people voted on one,
4. 4.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   Relationship is a euphemism for demographic data, and it's a fact that this is the direction that most online advertising is going. Advertisers want access to as many axes of demographic data as possible, and to target narrowly across
5. 5.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   > the way i would generate revenue would be to hold the successful ads hostage. Shadow ban advertisers accounts if they don't play ball. Literally remove viral commercials, but do it quietly. Playing whack-a-mole with YouTube/i
6. 6.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   There's nothing disorderly or actively harmful about that comment. It just adds little value compared to the search space of all possible comments. So it seems semantically more sound to simply withhold upvotes from it, rather than pun
7. 7.▲
   by underrated 12y ago

   A well-organized hate group can use downvotes to silence reasonable discourse and trumpet their ideology, so it looks like the popular opinion when it's nothing of the sort. You see this happen on Reddit. A hate group called SRS does i