Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
undecisive
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
> The point was you said it was intended to poke fun at traditional chivalry like it was a fact. But it was just your speculation. In a situation where the only thing anyone has is speculation, and speculation on top of speculation. Th
92.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I think there's a difference between "all politicians are liars", and "several people currently in positions of power are repeated being untruthful with absolute impunity because of the system of politics that is enablin
93.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
You're not wrong. But I think that's more a culture thing. The media - not just traditional print media - is feeling increasingly fragile since the shift away from newspapers. So while there's an appetite for it, news sites w
94.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
> Intel, which has 10,000 employees in China, said in its apology that it "respected the sensitivity of the issue in China." This reminds me of a recent British politics round-table interview, where a member of the ruling par
95.
▲
Framework Laptop now available for preorder in UK, Germany and France
(frame.work)
3 points
by
undecisive
5y ago
|
0 comments
96.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
That was my initial takeaway. I suspect that the outlier is the initial connection / handshake, and that all subsequent requests were much faster thanks to the QUIC / 0-RTT session ticket. But I can't see anywhere this is men
97.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I did wonder that. While technically that's true, in reality I believe: - They are under no obligation to keep your data if they delete your account - They are under no obligation to give you your data in a human-readable format - If t
98.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Absolutely. There has been some beautiful, deadpan sarcasm on this thread and I'm here for it...
99.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yep, let's be specific, the comment in question was: # Maybe this has been written for women, having calculated their age ;) Given that this person is clearly not natively english-speaking, there is a possibility that you ar
100.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I don't think they are evil, merely misguided. It feels like the "right thing" to have a CoC, and it only makes sense if you make it enforceable, and that only makes sense if you make it comprehensive. So I understand how we
101.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I was tempted to remove that line after I finished the whole post. Since it made someone happy, I'm very glad I left it in!
102.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I mean, hypothetically, what if self-appointed and loud "advocates", maybe even members of persecuted groups, narcissisticly pushed a project like that, bullied socially inept project leaders struggling against rising prejudice wi
103.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yeah, I presumed the only sensible reading of that sentence was "don't use sarcasm and jokes, as sarcasm and jokes are things that can be misinterpreted". Don't get me wrong - I understand that with an international comm
104.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I fear you have constructed a tectonic collision from a small mammal's soil-based home. If you are arguing against the phenomenon of CoCs in general, then I agree - they are a blight, rife with overreach and often easily misused to jus
105.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Somebody clearly disagrees with you, but you certainly aren't alone! [When I wrote this, you had been downvoted. Though it only occurs to me now that the sarcasm might have been completely lost on some people!]
106.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yeah, I just worry about the way they've lumped them together. I know some people who are sarcastic with every sentence they write. And I worry that unless the moderator's messages are very clearly worded, they may not realise tha
107.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
You see, I see this as a mis-step, and I think it's important to discuss such missteps. But I don't know enough about the internals of Vivaldi the company to know whether the company has bad attitudes and this is yet another manif
108.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
This is sarcasm. You have just broken their CoC... be thankful it wasn't on their forum!
109.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yep - losing your email account for misusing your email account makes sense. Losing your email account for being too sarcastic on a forum about your browser software seems weird, to say the least.
110.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yep - sorry if I wasn't clear on that, I didn't suppose any other forum was affected by this. But since their forum is one of the best ways to get / give help on the Vivaldi browser, and since I imagine most people who use vi
111.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Not sure how I feel with this. On one side, not many people have Vivaldi email accounts, so probably not a big deal at this point. And if you're going to have a code of conduct, at least it's a CoC with teeth. On the other side, i
112.
▲
Vivaldi: Violating CoC on forum may close your email account
(vivaldi.com)
129 points
by
undecisive
5y ago
|
209 comments
113.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yeah. Apparently: Stealing bread if I'm poor - It's okay Stealing bread from a millionaire if I'm poor - It's wrong Stealing bread from a duck if I'm poor - It's wrong Stealing bread from a homeless man if I&#x
114.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
> but please don't use commit messages like 'fix' :o I mean, I get it - I would avoid undescriptive commit messages myself, and I might mandate it for projects I own or am in some way responsible for. But I would never com
115.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I think it would be useful to know what kind of profile you fit, because everyone's must-haves are slightly different. For example, I would add: - at least opens 180 degrees: I often find myself having to do the odd bit of work in the
116.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Yeah, but most people are fine with (or at least resigned to) capitalism. What they object to is a lack of choice - especially when their choice is being actively subverted by a huge monopolistic entity (that said, if/when this feature
117.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
This is a complicated question, and for those new to this kind of discussion, it deserves a complicated answer. This is not that answer, but here are some thoughts: a) We are a reactionary species, unfortunately. And that served us well whe
118.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Maybe, but I think there are social contracts that you are overlooking. If I write a rule, and then I violate a rule (or refuse to censure someone for violating a rule) then I can be rightly accused of hypocrisy. People believe themselves t
119.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
I absolutely agree about both the impetus and the danger of this currently prevailing viewpoint. I will speak to the motivation however, because I'm a reconcillatory kind of person most of the time, and unlike this CoC I do believe int
120.
▲
by
undecisive
5y ago
Sadly true. But I reluctantly stop short of attributing that nasty side-effect as a defining goal of the CoC movement, because - you know - I always try to assume good intentions :) (Though, if you feel Hanlon's razor is a better motiv
More ›