uluyol

16 ms·

151.
by uluyol 5y ago
It's not. It's in a document proposing a more complex approach. The point of that discussion, which is clear in the original text, is to identify the benefits of the existing approach and retain them if possible through the transi
152.
In Defense of NIR(jlekstrand.net)
12 points by uluyol 5y ago|1 comments
153.
In Defense of NIR(jlekstrand.net)
2 points by uluyol 5y ago|0 comments
154.
by uluyol 5y ago
I'm not claiming that all ARM licensees use ARM cores. Rather, if ARM stopped offering competitive core designs (or limited them to just Nvidia), it would have a big impact on the ecosystem. A few players doing otherwise doesn't c
155.
by uluyol 5y ago
Sure, but allow and use are different things.
156.
by uluyol 5y ago
(2) is untrue. Most players use ARM core designs, not just the instruction set. Qualcomm used to make their own (back in 2014 or so) but hasn't since. Samsung tried after and quit in 2019. The cloud cores are all standard ARM designs (
157.
by uluyol 5y ago
It was a design goal that monomorphization should always be possible, but Go will not be monomorphizing generic functions to save on compile time / binary bloat (it will instead use GCShape stenciling, see below). I suspect future re
158.
by uluyol 5y ago
C++ [1], Java [2], Python [3], and even Rust [4] all have static analyzers. There will always be room for analysis that is beyond the compiler's purview. [1] https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks&#x2F
159.
by uluyol 5y ago
Why spend the cost on dual X and Y when you can failover to another cluster? For big DC workloads, it is usually, though not always, better to take the higher failure rate than add redundancy.
160.
by uluyol 5y ago
In most cases there is no parsing ambiguity. In the cases where there are, you need to use parenthesis to clarify.
161.
by uluyol 5y ago
You can do type X[T any] struct{} func (x *X[T]) Method() {} just fine. What you can't do is func (x *X[T]) Method[T2 any]() {}
162.
by uluyol 5y ago
Yes, https://proxy.golang.org/ You can also configure go to use your own for internal projects or if you just want to avoid the global proxy.
163.
What If Zink Was the Fastest GL Driver?(supergoodcode.com)
2 points by uluyol 5y ago|0 comments
164.
by uluyol 5y ago
Thanks for the response! I hadn't considered that last trick. If you can make it work well, it will be pretty cool.
165.
by uluyol 5y ago
I'm a little confused as to why someone would use this. There are a lot of benefits to keeping an entire instance of a service in one DC. BW is plentiful, latency is low, and a whole host of tools are at your disposal. Of course, there
166.
by uluyol 5y ago
I don't think these efficiencies are just from the node advantage. The fact is that Apple chips follow mobile designs and are highly integrated SoCs where Apple can optimize every aspect of the system in exchange for losing flexibility
167.
by uluyol 5y ago
You can say the same things about virtualization. Vendors use different virtualization extensions (see AMD-V vs VT-x) but we have interfaces that let us treat them as broadly being the same thing. Likewise virtualization has its fair share
168.
by uluyol 5y ago
That performance is really impressive. I'm no expert in this space, but I was expecting somewhere around 30% the throughput of a regular DB. They are way higher than that.
169.
by uluyol 5y ago
According to the article, CF doesn't provide anonymity for websites that infringe copyright. > But here, the parties agree that Cloudflare informs complainants of the identity of the host in response to receiving a copyright complai
170.
by uluyol 5y ago
cargo is not a compiler, it's a build system. The difference between build systems and compilers is that compilers implement language specs, and build systems do whatever they want. That's the problem with having multiple build sy
171.
by uluyol 5y ago
There have been big leadership shakeups at Intel over the past few months (see the CEO change). Long term, if they execute well, they should be back in a good position technically. In the meantime, their only option to offer competitive per
172.
by uluyol 5y ago
I thought they were useful for embedded use cases, where there isn't much going on so it can take a long time for the OS to collect enough entropy.
173.
by uluyol 5y ago
C++ uses apostrophes. If you want to use numbers in header files that are common to both C and C++ code, you want the syntax to be the same.
174.
by uluyol 5y ago
Lots of things are like this. I program my network using a network. I run a server (BMC) on my server. I start my engine with an engine ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird ).
175.
by uluyol 5y ago
AMD and Intel are fighting different battles right now. AMD is competing with Intel today. They're offerings are better so they're winning market share and growing. On the other hand, Intel really needs to be compared to the Intel
176.
by uluyol 5y ago
The support in Go 1.17 is very incomplete. A lot of work has been done in a branch (since merged) after the 1.17 freeze.
177.
by uluyol 5y ago
Go will allocate some things on the stack by performing escape analysis. That can be improved, but it's incorrect to say that GC is the only way to manage memory in Go.
178.
by uluyol 5y ago
It's been some time since I've used it, but Arch was more solid for me than any non-LTS distro. It definitely helps too stay up to date though. I remember the moves to pulseaudio and systemd...not fun. Of course, you also have the
179.
by uluyol 5y ago
Seems like the next step is to avoid downloading the full repository on every machine. If you had it stored on a few machines in the same DC (keep hot files in memory), you could just fetch things on demand with little latency penalty. Thou
180.
by uluyol 5y ago
I didn't mean to offend, sorry if my statement rubbed you the wrong way. All I'm saying is that users of a system don't think about design principles, they are there for the developers and operators to manage complexity and m

More ›