3 ms·
You can say the same things about virtualization. Vendors use different virtualization extensions (see AMD-V vs VT-x) but we have interfaces that let us treat t
by uluyol 5y ago
You can say the same things about virtualization. Vendors use different virtualization extensions (see AMD-V vs VT-x) but we have interfaces that let us treat them as broadly being the same thing.
Likewise virtualization has its fair share of bugs.
That doesn't make either virtualization or SGX worthless.
- lawl 5y agoVirtualization has usecases beyond security though. So even if virtualization was completely insecure by design, it wouldn't be useless. Does the same apply to SGX? What is SGX good for if it's not secure?