ulrashida

6 ms·

31.
by ulrashida 11mo ago
Please give an example of a statutory compliance item that "changes in real time". That's not the way regulations work. Your compliance is measured against a fixed version of legislation.
32.
by ulrashida 11mo ago
Frankly, that passphrase should already have been established when you were a kid: it would have been used for if a stranger / unexpected person needed to give you a ride on behalf of your parents.
33.
by ulrashida 1y ago
Ah yes, I am literate but I cannot read.
34.
by ulrashida 1y ago
What do you consider shameful about this? On the surface it looks like Maria fits the mold of previous winners pretty well other than perhaps her efforts are confined to her nation and have less global impact, but that isn't a requirem
35.
by ulrashida 1y ago
Why do you think Canadians are restricted from criticizing government?
36.
by ulrashida 1y ago
And yet even here it's not entirely factual -- the correct term is Democratic Senators. "Democrat" is a shortening often used for partisan purposes.
37.
by ulrashida 1y ago
Unfortunately if you're asking this of yourself you are almost certainly burned out. Speaking as someone currently thinking the same thing -- all the times in my career where I was powering through this sort of thing never crossed my
38.
by ulrashida 1y ago
Egg, meet face. Pretty funny that this was obviously "Google, find posts that prove my point" with nary a further shred of investigation.
39.
by ulrashida 3y ago
There doesn't appear to be much of a point to the article.
40.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Yes, because as we all remember there were no countries allied with Germany for any duration of the war.
41.
by ulrashida 3y ago
It sounds like you should read the report. "Life sucking for everyone" is not equal to the government of the day targeting a racial group for the multiple negative policies that were enacted. What level of injustice do you ascrib
42.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Apparently absent from Gee's approach: reductions to administration and management. When a university cuts $800k from its library and keeps chartering jets for executives you know this is not going to be about what is best for society
43.
by ulrashida 3y ago
I would have greatly preferred a non-clickbait title for this.
44.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Some news isn't valuable anymore. In the world we're going towards, wouldn't it be fair to expect that reliable/verified news will increase in value? Similarly, what is the true value of local news that would otherwi
45.
by ulrashida 3y ago
It is bizarre that you don't think safe workplaces are a right. The life situation that leads to this view is equally fascinating and concerning.
46.
by ulrashida 3y ago
That's true, but you can support a land tax without the other tenets of Georgism. It's unusually reductive.
47.
by ulrashida 3y ago
I agree, it feels like NASA has been thrown in to create a veneer of respectability for these conclusions. NASA does publish regular sea level assessments ( https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/ ) so perh
48.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Kyoto was in 1995 and predicted 1.5-4.5 degrees of change in the mid-21st century. Hardly "12 years out" mate. What has become more serious is that the incoming data and predictive models are starting to line up with greater accu
49.
by ulrashida 3y ago
You appear to be making up your own narrative here. In reality, climate science has gone from somewhat uncertain (around 1995: Kyoto) to progressively more certain as measurements have confirmed modellable outcomes. Our need to change our b
50.
by ulrashida 3y ago
McKinsey's product is McKinsey services. Imagine all the effort that goes into marketing, networking, and greasing the wheels of business that goes into selling this and you'll more readily appreciate why McKinsey keeps appearing
51.
by ulrashida 3y ago
It's hard to see a policy solution for this: if you're an authorized passenger for that seat you'd also be eligible to fly a plane and wreck it when you're not a passenger. There's no material reduction in risk (ot
52.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Oh no! Anyway...
53.
by ulrashida 3y ago
In flood prone parts of Australia it is quite common to list "property sits yy meters above 19XX flood level" as a premium signal to the risk averse. I would suspect that this isn't standard as most properties are worse off b
54.
by ulrashida 3y ago
This feels very dismissive of the efforts put in by genuine participants into the system. Exceptions and examples of malfeasance are not sufficient to indict all aspects.
55.
by ulrashida 3y ago
At some point this is banging-head-against-wall grade stuff, so I'll probably stop here. You're in the right area on the sales tax example, but it suffers from the same belief construction and expression issues. Let's play y
56.
by ulrashida 3y ago
In both cases it depends on how the belief is formed and expressed. To build upon your examples: Case 1 Belief: "I don't believe student loan debts should be forgiven." Action: Accepts student loan forgiveness. Outcome: Hypoc
57.
by ulrashida 3y ago
It's not hypocritical to believe something, but it is hypocritical to act in a way contrary to the belief you are espousing. A usable definition of hypocrisy is "the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which
58.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Importantly, I'm asking for the original commenter to clarify their position. I'm not comparing any sort of fruit at this point other than pointing out the disparity at the federal level. Do you have figures comparing "all-i
59.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Could you please support this statement: "The US spends more on education than the military"? This view ( https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/agency ) suggests Defense spending is $1.1 trillion in 2023 while D
60.
by ulrashida 3y ago
Is this a genuine question?

More ›