ueu33hyrdd

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ueu33hyrdd 6y ago

   You could literally say the same thing about the Steele Dossier sponsored by the Clinton Campaign, Steele was identified as connected to a foreign government influence campaign as well. A candidate literally cooperated with a foreign actor
2. 2.▲
   by ueu33hyrdd 6y ago

   Whether it harmonizes perfectly with the spirit of equal justice or not is irrelevant to whether or not it still represents an improvement over the status quo. Your hypothetical is similarly asanine and works mainly as a straw man because,
3. 3.▲
   by ueu33hyrdd 6y ago

   It's also how the competent rise though, in #1 they not only service a need but they identify that need on their own and in #4 they're completing tickets that are chosen partially based on how popular their resolution will be. Wha
4. 4.▲
   by ueu33hyrdd 6y ago

   This kind of language is exactly why people respond poorly to the term. Most people have worked hard for the things they have including white people, there isn't a secret check that you get every year for being in the pale people club.
5. 5.▲
   by ueu33hyrdd 6y ago

   I don't get the hostility towards requiring a warrant to spy on election candidates. Even if the goal is similar protections for everybody, it's obvious that measures designed to prevent parties from abusing the surveillance appar