udhghhe

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by udhghhe 10mo ago

   > Well it's certainly not worse than c, and it's hard to argue it's as bad, so... Except in regards to having a proper standard (the standard from Ferrocene has significant issues), and to the size of the language and how
2. 2.▲
   by udhghhe 10mo ago

   How much C++ have you written? Not C, but C++. Do you like pattern matching in Rust? It is one of the features that Rust does decently well at.
3. 3.▲
   by udhghhe 10mo ago

   But with no_std, Rust is not memory safe, even when not using unsafe. It does have pattern matching and modules, however.
4. 4.▲
   by udhghhe 10mo ago

   Thing is, Rust is not a memory safe programming language. It's not even close to being one. > Diagnosing a Double-Free Concurrency Bug in Rust's Unbounded Channels https://materialize.com/blog/rust-concurre