uaaiIbab

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by uaaiIbab 6y ago

   The difference is that most scientific breakthroughs didn't cost 20 billion euros. Not trying to be a smartass, i know the value of research without a certain end goal or outcome, i just think this is one exception where money is irres
2. 2.▲
   by uaaiIbab 6y ago

   A bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush. Having physicists continue work using the current collider and literally spending the 20b on education, would be a better use of their money than this.
3. 3.▲
   by uaaiIbab 6y ago

   Objectively, spending the money on covid research would be more beneficial than a particle collider. I don't see how anyone can even debate this. I know CERN doesn't specialise in that, but my question is why is our society so ine
4. 4.▲
   by uaaiIbab 6y ago

   What's the point of having a small, minimalist phone if it's going to be roughly the same price as a normal phone anyway?