tyrionsrke

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tyrionsrke 8y ago

   Informed consent is simply that -- being able to consent without missing a piece of knowledge. It may cure nothing. But the fact remains that Facebook acted (and continues to act) in bad faith to the user. Maybe nothing changes, especially
2. 2.▲
   by tyrionsrke 8y ago

   >There's no evidence of any of this. I disagree. I think Facebook, driven by ad dollars, is attempting to secure as many users as it can. Part of that is to make it as seamless and convenient as possible. Data as currency is a given
3. 3.▲
   by tyrionsrke 8y ago

   You're conflating the issue of informed consent with access ubiquity. Simply because the data was gathered in a way not unlike most apps, doesn't make it a non-story. In fact, the lack of informed consent and the very misleading s
4. 4.▲
   by tyrionsrke 9y ago

   It's not really trickery then, if it's both dramatic and accurate. Where would you like the origin point to be? Starting at 0 would flatten the loss over the same time span and would be both misleading about the importance of the
5. 5.▲
   by tyrionsrke 9y ago

   It seems you're searching the ground for the cause of the snow. The gender imbalance is systemic, and not at all that hard to explain. In the early 90s, as home PCs were becoming ubiquitous, they were in part marketed in the same vein