typeformer

9 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   Here this may help you get a sense of things: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wje9w5/the-tom-delonge-wi...
2. 62.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   Here's what I'll do, I'll change the title to something closer to the original PR title, then the haters can rest, but I'm not changing my comments.
3. 63.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   I don't exist for your amusement but you may find this interesting: https://silvarecord.com/2019/01/26/metamaterials-not-from-ea...
4. 64.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   Wow, you're really confident in that assesment. Maybe you would be interested to see the WikiLeaks leaked email exchange between Tom Delonge and John Podesta where Tom talks about his collaboration with Maj. Gen. William N. McCasland.
5. 65.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   While not stated explicitly in this PR, the meta-materials that are referenced are supposedly from possible ET craft. This announcement has everything to do with UFO's as TTSA (To the Stars Academy) is the group that brought publicity
6. 66.▲
   TTSA Announces CRADA with The U.S. ARMY to Advance Meta-Material Innovations(prnewswire.com)

   5 points by typeformer 7y ago|13 comments
7. 67.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   A very good point and nobody has any clue whatsoever because GDPR is a huge mess and it wasn't created with everyday realities of users in mind. That being said GDPR is probably better than nothing in terms of data rights and privacy
8. 68.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   The protesters should start using Waze...what will Apple do then?
9. 69.▲
   by typeformer 7y ago

   This is fffffffkkkkkdddd
10. 70.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    I think I know who built this, obviously, it wasn't Elliot Shefler
11. 71.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    I think I know who built this
12. 72.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Thanks for the heads up
13. 73.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    yikes
14. 74.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    People explanations on that thread are weak AF.
15. 75.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Maybe you could say that the are obviously not from this world...as many of the piolets have said.
16. 76.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    There were multiple jets scrambled, they all tracked the objects, with radar, infrared video, high-def video, and laser range finding. Why are people so stubborn about this?
17. 77.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Because the guy on the plane responsible for the data testified on camera that he was instructed to grab the the "bricks" (specialized hard drives) immediately upon landing and they were then confiscated and quickly flown off of t
18. 78.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    We know for sure that at least the radar from E-2C Hawkeye plane in the area that had returned was confiscated by plainclothes officials who landed on the Nimitz via helicopter.
19. 79.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    The object turns on its end and the pilot saw it do this with his own eyes, it's an is aerodynamically unstable position. If you want more info regarding the AtFlir system see the link in this post: https://news.ycombinator.
20. 80.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    If you would like to know more about the technology tracking these crafts see this compiled list: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21013316
21. 81.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Please see exactly how these objects were tracked before you degrade these researchers work. They're using the scientific method but you are not. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21013316
22. 82.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    No, I'm sorry but your ideas don't line up with facts and data. It has less to do with the professionals and more to do with the sophistication of the multiple types of technology tracking the craft. Check out exactly how these cr
23. 83.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    If you're interested to know more about exactly what was the wide and varied spectrum of sophisticated technology that tracked these ET crafts following the Nimitz group over six days I've compiled a list here: https://
24. 84.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Chill dog, I’m under the character limit.
25. 85.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    For context: Around mid November 2004 US airspace was invaded by a fleet of unknown craft displaying sophisticated technology and maneuvering that, as far as the general public knows, can not be explain by conventional physics. At least one
26. 86.▲
    How the Navy tracked a fleet of UFOs over the course of six days

    15 points by typeformer 7y ago|4 comments
27. 87.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Nothing your saying makes sense, multiple pilots are not going to see the same reflection, not to mention these objects were tracked by spaced based radar, the radar on the ships, the radars on the fighter jets, sonar, and via infrared and
28. 88.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    You don't get it, there is a huge race to commercialize these very real ET technologies and the private black budget defense sector has a massive head start. Tom has the first public fund going, wait till venture capital gets their tee
29. 89.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Explain why Raytheon's Director of Engineering also believes that they captured a ET craft, they've even used it in their marketing! https://www.raytheon.com/news/feature/uap_atflir
30. 90.▲
    by typeformer 7y ago

    Yeah the whole world is going to be very upset someday about the coverup, hence the continued cover up.