tylermarques

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tylermarques 10d ago

   Yes they definitely do - not claiming it's a perfect solution, but as a V1 product it shows a lot of promise.
2. 2.▲
   by tylermarques 11d ago

   We had early access and found it to be pretty useful. Having a second form of verification, where you can ask multiple questions (in the form of Nouls) raised our confidence in the outputs of other models. [0] IMHO This type of model works
3. 3.▲
   by tylermarques 1mo ago

   I've had a lot of success combating this by adding "All summaries need to adhere to ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English standards" [0] which I discovered from another HN thread [1] [0] https://www.asd-ste100.or
4. 4.▲
   by tylermarques 4mo ago

   There is some evidence.[1] The best reviewer is a different model with fresh context, worst is same model with same context. 1. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.04582
5. 5.▲
   by tylermarques 8mo ago

   In the same vein, we recently released a version v0.1 of our humor benchmark. [1] We use human answers from a cards against humanity style game call Bad Cards [2] as ground truth for what is funny. The models get to choose a card from a han
6. 6.▲
   IPv6 Based Canvas(canvas.openbased.org)

   91 points by tylermarques 1y ago|25 comments
7. 7.▲
   by tylermarques 1y ago

   Sorry about that! We've toned down the music a bit, trying to put more emphasis on the narrator. Thanks for the feedback :) We're hoping to create more like this! :)
8. 8.▲
   Show HN: AI Playing Diplomacy(twitch.tv)

   2 points by tylermarques 1y ago|2 comments