tyhjmhytgfv

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   What people care about shouldn't affect the law. Suppose a 14year old girl stole some underwear - the store then videos her in her bedroom in the underwear and puts it on TV as an ad campaign. Still acceptable in the USA?
2. 2.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   It is if the only selling point for the chip was it's advanced capabilities if you used the custom compiler. If people are only buy Itaniums to run legacy x86 code THAT is significant - it would be like Apple announcing sales of Macbooks bu
3. 3.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   Sorry I thought the owner remotely started the video camera - but accessing the recording remotely could still be considered wiretapping
4. 4.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   Video recording somebody in the privacy of their home and broadcasting it without their permission or knowledge.
5. 5.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   In the UK they got TomTom to remove the speed camera database from it's sat nav. Instead there was a 3rd party site where you could download an updated database of accident black spots - the ones where they put speed cameras.
6. 6.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   Worse I did `cal 9 1752` and lost two weeks
7. 7.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   Oh good then they wont be a problem anymore
8. 8.▲
   by tyhjmhytgfv 16y ago

   They should pass one of these new laws banning drugs as well that will stop drugs. A law against murder might also be a good idea