tyciol

4 ms·

1.
by tyciol 14y ago
The world is full of disgusting people that disturb us. Rape victims aren't exactly alone in that. If Kylie's more concerned about fappers than Ken raping her again, then I'm kinda confused.
2.
by tyciol 14y ago
One possibility I'd offer: comics can be used to teach empathy. Erotica can portray things in unrealistic senses, but creative writers can and have constructed elaborate plots that explore these unrealisms and their potential consequences.
3.
by tyciol 14y ago
We can compare anything ;)
4.
by tyciol 14y ago
"giving them the ability to watch detailed scenarios of abuse" You mean like what the police who investigate real tapes have? This 'raises the possibility' thing is a bad slippery slope. Let's argue that playing GTA raises the possibility p
5.
by tyciol 14y ago
I don't agree with the assertion. Looking at something does not automatically determine that the observer holds some kind of specific psychological condition. Or are you saying that anyone who dares to click the screwdriver link is a sadist
6.
by tyciol 14y ago
Why do you try to fill people with a false sense of security Akemi? How do we know obscenity charges are rare? Why should we think it would only apply to 'hardcore' porn? http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedom-of-... Per
7.
by tyciol 14y ago
>"having naked sexually posed images of oneself available online is not especially helpful to the individual and may lead to negative attention, bullying, abuse and such. Making such actions illegal is saying that they are outside of th
8.
by tyciol 14y ago
This links into his 'follow the money' theory. If people were doing this, you find out who is earning money from doing the abuse, and you jail them. Same with those who are funding it. People who download music for free on pirating sites ar