ty6853

39 ms·

661.
by ty6853 2y ago
The US does not recognize non-immigrant (tourist/student/some work visas) aliens to be people, thus they don't have all the rights the people have like bearing arms (which is ascribed to people like the 4th amendment does, un
662.
by ty6853 2y ago
"We've tried litigating these cases before and after always failing we gave up pursuing these kinds of cases" -- in so many words.
663.
by ty6853 2y ago
The situation resolved in my passport being flagged, feds executing a fruitless search warrant (thankfully the doctors would not go through with the full cavity search but i am in debt for the warrant), and lawyers telling me I'm SOL.
664.
by ty6853 2y ago
Immigration in the US is designed around rewarding the daring liar. Overstaying a visa isn't even illegal and extremely difficult to enforce, and working informally is trivial and pretty much impossible to enforce in a country where ci
665.
by ty6853 2y ago
Don't worry they do it to citizens too. On one occasion CBP told me they would not let me enter the country. On another they imprisoned me for ~12 hours, on another they asked me if I work in the US and tried to demand ever more intr
666.
by ty6853 2y ago
Yes it takes time. There should be some temporary deflation to taxpayers though as the shit canned officials sell off their goods and houses, if the premise sister proposed is true that they go belly up on mortgage and rent.
667.
by ty6853 2y ago
Sure but if worker own businesses generate more profit for workers then the workers can use that wealth to buy, I mean lobby and later employ, officials just like other businesses no? I don't see why they cant do all the same corrupt
668.
by ty6853 2y ago
When I bought my land the #1 driver of cost was either covenants (basically irreversible burden written by now dead boomers in the 80s who were furious someone would build anything but a mansion next to their mobile home pig farm) or zoning
669.
by ty6853 2y ago
There are plenty of worker owned businesses. If this leads to more worker prosperity then the free market should push workers into them and to form them. They are free to do so, so what gives?
670.
by ty6853 2y ago
This is 1000% true. Owner builder DIY building is basically unregulated where I live. I built a 600 sq ft house for like $40,000 last year. I have a plan that works, but either no one believes me or they spend all their time looking for w
671.
by ty6853 2y ago
It's crushing Hong Kong was handed over, as they had about the free-est import/export burdens and regulations in the world. Everyone everywhere wants to kill the golden goose and it's mind boggling that the only people that
672.
by ty6853 2y ago
I think the trouble you're having in understanding here is that the government workers paycheck came from violently taking it from someone else, not from market value of generating something that can be spent. Imagine you farm and crea
673.
by ty6853 2y ago
I don't want to give him the benefit but I also question how even a strongman can justify over $1M per ATM. My alarm bells are ringing that I'm missing something.
674.
by ty6853 2y ago
The main argument for government employees is not that they generate more wealth spending than the private sector. If that were the case we'd just make everyone government employees. Generally the government is worse at generating wea
675.
by ty6853 2y ago
Government employees are funded by taxing or inflating away wealth from the productive economy. That wealth doesn't evaporate when the government employee is fired, it is instead reverts back for spending to the entities from which it
676.
by ty6853 2y ago
Government employees draw their money from taxes, inflation, or debt that's paid by one of the two. Stop spending is a bit of a myth, it reverts the spending to whatever productive entity in the economy it was taken from.
677.
by ty6853 2y ago
Paper money was first used in the West in Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1690, was used in limited fashion, became unpopular and then phased out. And that was the end -- paper money was a failure. Wait.... The currency was initially unpop
678.
by ty6853 2y ago
I don't trust El Salvador. I also don't trust the people indicting their policy. I hope to God they have more than 400 ATM to show for 375M. Surely there is more to it.
679.
by ty6853 2y ago
> by questioning the beliefs that cause you to feel what you're feeling I think one oversight is that you presuppose this. My beliefs in this case counter my feelings. I have nothing but warm regards, in belief, for dudes that want
680.
by ty6853 2y ago
You also can't print to oblivion while sending your hard money overseas if the plebs operate and pay taxes in Bitcoin.
681.
by ty6853 2y ago
375 minus like 287 in unrealized gains. My next question is are they still behind once you consider the market value of the ATM and other investments. I doubt it's a total write off.
682.
by ty6853 2y ago
Which is why the federal reserve was ostensibly decoupled from politics and democratic election, and designed in secret on Jackyll island so the public would not poison it. Unfortunately as you say if you try to time the market, or centrall
683.
by ty6853 2y ago
Most of the bombs/munitions the US drops is from the perspective of the American worker the equivalent of digging holes in the desert. The way to have more goods and services is to make more goods and services. Releasing people from d
684.
by ty6853 2y ago
I think any civil war would have a split within the military, because in your premise that they're using tanks and aircraft, some people are not going to want to bomb the place where their mother or child lives, not to mention the supp
685.
by ty6853 2y ago
This is an inherent property of closed source proprietary weapons. Which is why gun owners like stuff like the gen3 glock and ar-15 as everyone knows how to make the parts and the open source blueprints are put into manufacture by a gazill
686.
by ty6853 2y ago
Yes and the red pill moment is when you realize this is exactly why your speech was banned. They will leave provably wrong stuff up as a head on pike to show you're an idiot. They will let correct but unpersuasive stuff up, because wh
687.
by ty6853 2y ago
You generally only get targetted like that (anywhere in life) if you both have wrong opinions and you have a sophisticated and persuasive holistic argument that wins people over. If they can prove you wrong they'll be happy to leave i
688.
by ty6853 2y ago
I was banned from all of reddit by paid moderators after an ivy league lawyer specifically targetted me, sifted through years of history for their best approach, and convinced them that my opinion on gun control was incorrect legal advice.
689.
by ty6853 2y ago
5 years ago was when it became totally unusable and I stopped trying to find a way to use it. COVID gave a lot of people with a half ounce of power the green light to trump up 'misinformation' as murderous/violent, which was
690.
by ty6853 2y ago
As reddit became more commercialized, somehow it turned into a place where mere opinions resulted in bans. Sometimes directly, but more often what happens is moderators allowed users with sanctioned opinions to relentlessly verbally deride

More ›