Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ty6853
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
631.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
If he switches from contract/1099 to a wage job I wonder if child support will start garnishing the fuck out of it. This is the black hole a lot of people get sucked into and end up having to start their own business to buy some runwa
632.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Another cause for disregard for liability: - I am broke and nothing to lose - My impoverished neighborhood is full of crime and I need protection - Police do not protect and X number of my family are felons as a byproduct of pove
633.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
You do, there is just a greater gain factor constant.
634.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Yep, if you are depending on perception by media you have already lost. They will manipulate it to look however they like, trivially and convincingly. If change does occur, what will happen is they will repaint history to make it seem as i
635.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Suppressing protests in US isn't usually law enforcement, its purpose is to violate the law and suppress speech.
636.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Lol they've wisened up to that, now they just take your phone in secondary. If you are a veteran they likely just see you as more of a threat.
637.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
I think people often think something they did or didn't do lead them to be fucked with. Having gone through the border and checkpoint many many times with absolutely wild variation despite doing same stuff, my observation it is 99% wh
638.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Well maybe not arrested. CBP has jailed me before but it wasn't an arrest since it is administrative. You can't even contact a lawyer like an arrested person can.
639.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
If you leave US mainland customs zone and go to saipan or Guam or something it will probably slow you down and they might claim you need it, even though you don't. Also Mexico never changed their law like US did, iirc you can still e
640.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Iirc not legal advice but there are reasons why some people may not want to apply for citizenship, if something has happened since they got their green card and they'd prefer not to have to have to put on an application.
641.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Well yes in places with no internet access people don't buy internet, but it's a bit tautological. People who survive by subsistence but come upon hard money somehow, in some place with towers, I have personally seen them blow a
642.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Counterpoint: in the third world some 3rd rate shack with a shitty well or water source may often come 'free' as it stays in the family. I have seen people in the third world blow most their paycheck on phone and internet related
643.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
> That's a matter of months, not years. That sounds convincing until you realize we're already on a cr from December [0] which created the same fictional premise. >t's an emergency measure to be used while they set abou
644.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
How many ibuprofen pirates are there in Europe? None, because it's easy enough to get it without a cartel operation. Making wanted goods and services illegal just hands profits to the black market, it doesn't stop them. If Spain
645.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
HAM isn't an acronym, FYI. If you break the internet and summon starlink yes I think pirates will take the void.
646.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Booted out of where, space?
647.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
The irony here is the government has little grip in much of central Africa. Militias roam the bush with little fear of law. Places like CAR are nations only because europeans drew it like that on a map. Killing the internet may be the on
648.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Why isn't congress defunding all this waste? Aren't they supposed to know what they're funding rather than shoving through CR that continue previous spending ? DOGE shouldn't exist, and it only exists because our worth
649.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Why did I have to share my feelings? Fuck your dystopia. I've done nothing wrong.
650.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Duterte had popular support. You can argue, successfully, that what he did was wrong. But I don't think you can so easily dismiss that you understand the situation better than the Filipino people living in it that made the assessment
651.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
100% agree, but something doesn't sit well with me about a country handing a democratic mandate for their leader to do the murderous bidding of the will of the people, then rather than judging him by his peers they betray him to foreig
652.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
>>I’d argue most of the cost of scare housing is supply limits imposed by ridiculous over regulation of new construction >Nobody is talking about housing prices Actually we were? Nobody but you thought land and a house is the same
653.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Moving the shell of a house in my county is illegal without waste treatment, which is part of the house permit that forms the legal entity of a house. And I live in about the most deregulated county in the lower 49. You could theoretically
654.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
And your strategy of fueling the stalemate would have this go on indefinitely, war monger.
655.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
You don't seem to understand how land works in the US. Owning land is more like a license to do certain things in a certain place. Part of that is the license and infrastructure that forms a house. Land is part of the house. Your ar
656.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
That is an insane assertion, does your house stand on a cloud without plumbing or electricity? Some places require a plan for water and septic on your land before they'll even approve a house.
657.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
... on the US allied side. The government has known this for 10+ years, if it was illegal I'd have already went to jail. Look up Ashley Cervantes case if you don't believe it can't happen to anybody.
658.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Lady named Cervantes had doctors warrantlessly finger raping her and lost due to jurisdiction fuck fuck games ( i also talked to her lawyer). Happen all the time, CBP lost once iirc in new mexico and letters were sent and thenn promptly ig
659.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Again it uses 'the people' in the 4th amendment though, which is usually argued as applying generally to people without a difference. Based on wording 2A and 4A applies to tourists, or neither do.
660.
▲
by
ty6853
2y ago
Visa violations are mala prohibata offenses. I've found it nearly impossible to convince someone who believes such offenses should be overlooked that they shouldn't, or the other way around, because it cuts to the very core of ou
More ›