ty6853

35 ms·

601.
by ty6853 2y ago
Does fisher own a grey market import export business? Massive profits will be there made.
602.
by ty6853 2y ago
Sure, you have to pay for public road parasitism by pedestrian, public transit on roads funded partially by fuel taxes, and heavy road destroying vehicles. Not that I blame them, they're taking advantage of incentives offered. Who wo
603.
by ty6853 2y ago
That seems doubtful but possible since fares of public transit tend to run at a loss. Most public transit just offloaded the cost on poor who must drive to less accessible and less wealthy unserviced areas as collected tax expenditures fro
604.
by ty6853 2y ago
There are a shocking number of properties with covenants that either disallow black people or something associated with slaves like cotton. Which given how unpopular that is now, goes to show that it is so impossible to reverse covenants yo
605.
by ty6853 2y ago
In my state you don't sign the hoa (covenants). Instead it is just something a dead guy signed 40 years ago, encumbered on the land for infinity*, and recorded somewhere. Maybe the title search will turn it up, maybe it won't, b
606.
by ty6853 2y ago
You still don't need ID to enter Mexico 9 of 10 times. The only crossing that even glanced my ID was Tijuana. Of course it's not like they have anything to lose, if you don't have money or work they're happy to let you
607.
by ty6853 2y ago
Passports were much rarer before WW1, it is indeed a bit bizarre as the world allegedly embraced liberalism and moved away from imperialism that the real crack down treating humans as property of government that need hall passes and permiss
608.
by ty6853 2y ago
Clearly they aren't as that would have implied Biden could have simply dictated that the DEA reschedule marijuana, which seems to have been effectively halted by stalling until Trump got in office by stalling the hearings until one day
609.
by ty6853 2y ago
Why not build another entrance, and host free parties and liquor. Only on the Canadian side lol.
610.
by ty6853 2y ago
This may sound a bit nuts but I honestly think Trump is doing this because immigration, foreign policy, and commander in chief are the three areas where he has nearly dictatorial powers, so he simply chose to turn those cranks because those
611.
by ty6853 2y ago
I was chained by malicious CBP officers, and much worse, and not only that I am in debt for it. Maybe it influenced me. The very thought of this happening to benign tourists makes me upset. I don't think anyone should be in a good
612.
by ty6853 2y ago
I get put in secondary almost every time and it is pretty much always jam packed with sad people, although I am usually the only English speaker so I have trouble finding out what happened exactly. Sometimes they sit in chairs next to me,
613.
by ty6853 2y ago
I would only do this if you want to get strip searched, shackled, chained, driven around in a prisoner van, examined by doctors at your expense then released a day later without apology. Make sure your affairs are in order to be disappeare
614.
by ty6853 2y ago
4th amendment ascribes that right to 'the people.' Non immigrant aliens are not considered people as evidence by their lack of right to bear arms, the other right ascribed to 'the people.'. Courts have held for decades n
615.
by ty6853 2y ago
... I pay into the system. That's what your sort of disingenuous argument leads to, I'm against funding Ukraine therefore you think this merits I must prove the case of the entire fucking tax system. You're horribly mistake
616.
by ty6853 2y ago
I guess I should be honored someone made a burner account just to reply these sorts of rebuttals to me while smily facing about terrorists on an article about someone who seems much closer to a benign backpacker.
617.
by ty6853 2y ago
Due process is what, government systematically searching everyone flying internally (often referring large cash for seizure by DEA etc) in the US without due process describing the alleged offense and the items being searched? Americans a
618.
by ty6853 2y ago
Ah but you don't understand the role this plays in maintaining physical security of literally every secure location on earth, comrade.
619.
by ty6853 2y ago
And people were outraged, then it became status quo. Now getting fondled by the TSA is passively accepted and hardly anyone writes about it anymore.
620.
by ty6853 2y ago
Yep. I'm a white boy citizen and they've shackled and chained ( and strip searched) me before for funzies, no one gives a shit unless you're a well off European tourist or white lady. People think it's new, happened to
621.
by ty6853 2y ago
But is Pelosi buying it?
622.
by ty6853 2y ago
Iirc a judge stopped the systematic requirement to inspect, but if you're not a citizen and refuse they can put you in the deportation gulag for a couple weeks and I guess not look at the phone. Not legal advice.
623.
by ty6853 2y ago
Not having a phone, or having a burner is even more suspicious, comrade. Remember CBP doesn't need a reason, they have jailed me before as a citizen without even an arrest. You have basically no rights at the border.
624.
by ty6853 2y ago
Lol in my state I can see every (unsealed) civil case with a simple online query. My landlords have pretty much all done it, I don't know if the background checks show it but it's an extra 15 seconds to hedge a 10k+ potential lia
625.
by ty6853 2y ago
Given that particular strike was against in part automation it was that they wanted their port to become less competitive and eventually be destroyed by ports employing automation and not even jobs left for their kids to fix or engineer the
626.
by ty6853 2y ago
There's a great video of a longshoreman union rep bragging about crushing America so 'his guys' could get by, all the while with totaly lost irony he said this on TV while wearing a gold chain, Rolex, and living in an absolut
627.
by ty6853 2y ago
It works, but court cases are public record. Good luck getting anyone to touch you with a ten foot pole afterwards, not like the candidate can prove why they weren't selected.
628.
by ty6853 2y ago
>Of course it does - because both parents are responsible for the welfare of the children, and so if they both decide that they want to lower the standard of living that is a shared/joint agreement. So a couple points here 1) we&#x2
629.
by ty6853 2y ago
>it is not fair for one parent to deprive the child of support and resources that they would otherwise receive because of a dispute with the other parent. Only in a rather crazy partnership is that the case. My child's resources an
630.
by ty6853 2y ago
It is based on imputed not actual income, unlike taxes. Hence say someone getting taken hostage by terrorists will owe back support and be jailed upon their release [0]. The tax analogy would be the IRS thinks you should be better at stoc

More ›