ty6853

34 ms·

511.
by ty6853 2y ago
Are we living in the same world? I had a child born about that time which was one of the few ways to actually get into a hospital. When I went in the fucking place was barren. A bunch of medical professionals shaking in their shoes waiti
512.
by ty6853 2y ago
Why not just make a flat tax for everyone and end all the special interest pandering and exceptions for the rich. It is a poisonous misapplication of the time of our government to constantly be fiddling with tax code to favor one group or
513.
by ty6853 2y ago
And NSF grants?
514.
by ty6853 2y ago
As is water in large quantities
515.
by ty6853 2y ago
I have been in countries like that and I've found they were quite open to talking to me about it, since I was obviously a foreigner much less likely to snitch on them than even their family or friends. Buy a beer for someone in a dict
516.
by ty6853 2y ago
The negative reinforcement is supposed to be when they actually attempt to unlawfully kill others, a 9mm bullet goes through their head. Until then, they have the right to their opinion. It's hard to imagine isolating them from coun
517.
by ty6853 2y ago
By interacting with the positive aspects of the person and ignoring or disengaging from the political opinions I don't like. If they want to kill jews or whatever, they have the right to that opinion, doesn't bother me so long as
518.
by ty6853 2y ago
It's an interesting idea, but good luck getting your argument heard. I've been tossed in immigration cell as a US citizen. I filed an FBI records search and there was not even an arrest record or any record of it happening, they
519.
by ty6853 2y ago
Immigration judges aren't judges in the conventional sense (like the ones in the judicial branch), so they don't have the legal power you're thinking of. They are members of the executive branch and judges basically only in
520.
by ty6853 2y ago
Due process here is administrative, not criminal, so the non-citizen isn't entitled to the kind of trial you're thinking he would get were he criminally charged. Due process for an administrative action just means the prescribed
521.
by ty6853 2y ago
Because the law isn't based on justice, morality, or ethics. It is merely a system by which power is wielded. You are basing your judgement on a fictional caricature that is not reality. What 'should' happen has zero beari
522.
by ty6853 2y ago
Was that a real judge in the judicial branch or one of those 'judges' in the executive branch kangaroo courts?
523.
by ty6853 2y ago
Who on earth would take someone suspected to be a gang member, other than his home country where he has the right to return? What makes more sense it to deport him (not that I agree with deportation here) to El Salvador and have the author
524.
by ty6853 2y ago
The native tongue of the writer appears to be Spanish. They likely either live in a hispanic country or in a hispanic neighborhood of the US, where such overbearing Karen snitches do not exist.
525.
by ty6853 2y ago
Advantech OSB will outlast conventional plywood by a mile in the rain. I exposed it, flat (the worst way possible) as subfloor, to rains for 1+ year while building my house with only maybe 1mm of fiber degrading on the surface a few places
526.
by ty6853 2y ago
>No, my case is predicated on it being bad to share information about an upcoming military operation with the Editor in Chief of The Atlantic and that doing so is the result is of a series of objectively illegal and incompetent actions.
527.
by ty6853 2y ago
Your case is predicated on the assumption that national security is a goal, and therefore highly flawed, as that is only the idealized goal of our military sector. Soldiers are largely brainwashed and lied to about this, which often perpet
528.
by ty6853 2y ago
I'm evaluating why they don't seem to care, not justifying it.
529.
by ty6853 2y ago
Their extraordinarily rare shoot down have not served as a defense against our bombing campaigns. It is operationally meaningless.
530.
by ty6853 2y ago
> [the Houthis] have no air defense - False True. They have since Obama shot down less than what, one drone a year? This is no air defense and your own evidence confirms it. At best it serves as a rare annoyance but is strategically d
531.
by ty6853 2y ago
It's been filled with this kind of reasoning since at least the Iraq War and probably longer. That half of trillion has to be spent somewhere and the cabinets always need to manufacture a reason. That the campaign fails and more &#x2
532.
by ty6853 2y ago
Ok, de minimis air defenses, per the nauseating HN pedantry. The Yemenis have been bombed by drones since at least Obama's extrajudicial citizen murder. How many have they shot down, less than one a year on average? >, wasting ten
533.
by ty6853 2y ago
The US military bombing Houthis is like squishing an ant, they have no air defense and no risk of meaningful counter attack. Understand they literally don't care about opsec, nor is there much reason why they should. It's an exer
534.
by ty6853 2y ago
Now would be a great time for her to pop out a few kids though, if Holmes is any guidance.
535.
by ty6853 2y ago
This kind of risk mitigation is probably a losing strategy. Lawyers will find any reason to crucify you.
536.
by ty6853 2y ago
The federal reserve doesn't want zero risk banking where end customer is effectively 100% on their books, and will deny accounts to any bank that functions the way your service would would work ( see the denial of account to The Narrow
537.
by ty6853 2y ago
I'm not appealing to authority (I did not even mention economists who thought this way until YOU chose to make it personal about problem people for America), I am providing examples that the counter argument does not make you stupid, w
538.
by ty6853 2y ago
You mean avoidance.
539.
by ty6853 2y ago
Lol I am paraphrasing Milton Friedman [0 1]. A very ignorant, stupid person with a Nobel prize in economics. [0] “Do We Need Central Banks?” by Milton Friedman In Monetary Management in Hong Kong, Proceedings of the Seminar on Monetary Man
540.
by ty6853 2y ago
Sales tax was already paid when it was new, the state got its due. That kind of idiotic policy is how expensive and collector cars get owned under an LLC and the LLC changes hands rather than the title. Thus the rich bypass all that BS it

More ›