ty6853

23 ms·

301.
by ty6853 1y ago
The 'communist' countries generally did these same things. The russians famously just straight up executed anarcho-communists and competing socialist factions and any union of persons associated with such. They employed essentia
302.
by ty6853 1y ago
I mean the nazis were nominally socialist. And they had heavy price and wage controls and de facto government control of much of industry. They used communism-lite.
303.
by ty6853 1y ago
It is due to the fact EVs relatively freeload via using roads without paying fuel taxes, and take from everyone else using ev federal subsidies. Of course 18-wheelers and large trucks are probably worse. Small passenger ICE cars end up pay
304.
by ty6853 1y ago
I wish I could share your optimism of the trajectory of the American experiment.
305.
by ty6853 1y ago
I hope he is getting his affairs in order. Because, although I take no joy in saying this, the state is going to ship him out. Bail is just buying time to cash out bank accounts, wrap up relationships and give personal effects to someone wi
306.
by ty6853 1y ago
Many people and kids die from effects of homelessness yet regulations that make houses less accessible persist, so I'm not confident of your thesis people will fix the laws to save the kids. I would posit one of the best things we coul
307.
by ty6853 1y ago
Argentina's people seem to have dealt with this through mass tax fraud, hiding money in crypto/cash/real assets, insubordination to law, and electing a self proclaimed anarcho-capitalist. Somehow they've managed to thri
308.
by ty6853 1y ago
You are discovering this. It wasn't that long ago when the national guard took tuition money away from Kent State in the form of executing their students for free speech.
309.
by ty6853 1y ago
In my state the people are there because there is water. You can't make new places attractive, because all the people will be dead. It's basically a 100% correlation between location of towns and whether you can economically dri
310.
by ty6853 1y ago
This is the double edge sword of moving away from voluntary transaction in the market and towards government-imposed funding. The government takes away your ability to choose what to fund, holds the purse, then smacks the purse at you fill
311.
by ty6853 1y ago
OF course capex declines when you tarriff. Part of Trump's genius tarriff plan was closing trade deficits. Except trade deficit is just mostly a measure of how much countries choose to park the returns on their goods/services in y
312.
by ty6853 1y ago
The materials are very cheap. Last year I built a house for ~30k shell, about ~60k with utilities and everything inside of it. My own labor. Of course, there are only a handful of counties that will let you do that without licenses, or a b
313.
by ty6853 1y ago
I agree it is not unreasonable, but I'd also note that bars have their livelihood at stake. While a child has their phone at stake, you cannot threaten their livelihood without a trip to prison. There are no material stakes to the chi
314.
by ty6853 1y ago
Unfortunately housing will still not get cheaper because nearly the entire supply is locked into 30 year loans at near 0%, even a fool would starve, default their car note, and sell their every last valuable before giving that up.
315.
by ty6853 1y ago
I also doubt he knew the realities of supermax. I won't debate the merits of supermax for Ted but even by prison standards there is an extreme level of isolation that is particularly psychologically damaging. I honestly would not know
316.
by ty6853 1y ago
Ted wrote Dave many times after that when he needed something. Like money. The last memoir I could find on that link indicated Dave's wife went out of her way to stop Dave from attempting to see him again before the arrest. https:&#
317.
by ty6853 1y ago
I didn't make any mistake. I considered all four of your very obvious points, which everyone here knows, it is excruciatingly boring to point them out. But people are loathe to look at unintended consequences, I want to present one of
318.
by ty6853 1y ago
Get rid of doesn't just mean get the body away from their proximity. Ted wrote David letters about how much he disliked the woman and marriage. The wife and Ted hated each other by my assessment. I don't think her obsession with
319.
by ty6853 1y ago
Most everyone agrees turning in Kaczynski was a good thing. And in the article it mentions he made peace with the fact it was a good thing. The thing I think David had to contend with was not whether it was good or bad, but the impetus wit
320.
by ty6853 1y ago
The lower the supply of people willing to do this, the higher Palentir can bid. And thus is the quandary. Discouraging this behavior only makes it more profitable.
321.
by ty6853 1y ago
Every "beautiful developing country" I've been in has been able to make prices arbitrarily low to the end user while still paying the full telecom prices by use of some sort of sharing like a cafe. It doesn't matter so m
322.
by ty6853 1y ago
As far as I know US prices are the lowest ones available to Africans for satellite internet. Is it cheaper to launch in Africa? If you think it's cheaper to launch rockets and use engineers in Sudan or something you have outsmarted Be
323.
by ty6853 1y ago
Emerging markets with next to nill infrastructure and high practical barriers to terrestrial infrastructure due to no roads / legal protection or presence of easements / people will rip fiber right out of the ditch to sell for $0.
324.
by ty6853 1y ago
Even filings like this one appear to purjure them then, as they claim the owner of the business at starlink.com is Starlink Services LLC [0]. The FCC petition as a telecom carrier appears to be for Starlink Services LLC [1]. This is in ad
325.
by ty6853 1y ago
Both Wikipedia and various telecom bids / contracts I found listed it as ' Starlink Services, LLC'. Which is owned by SpaceX, but it appears to be a separate company. The entity I found in an Oregon bid was registration #4503
326.
by ty6853 1y ago
This got me wondering who the CEO of Starlink is. I could not find it anywhere. I know who the CEO of the 100% owner of Starlink is, but not Starlink itself. Do they even have one? IIRC most states when filing an LLC for private equity re
327.
by ty6853 1y ago
Wouldn't it be possible to privatize space in some way like land, and then enforce any damages to neighbor's 'land'/orbit?. Might involve some easements for 'right of way' into higher / intersecting
328.
by ty6853 1y ago
Looks like I misread >they can run fiber on it without any change. I thought it said without charge, my bad. High cost but no change I guess.
329.
by ty6853 1y ago
No doubt, but given the cost and challenge of launching a satellite, I think your best bet if your rural enclave despises Starlink for whatever reason, right now your best bet is to run fiber to a single house and make a mini wireless ISP.
330.
by ty6853 1y ago
If you get 'free' fiber you are just punting the cost to other members. It cost me $15,000 to establish my co-op membership 1,000 ft it went to the next guy. Our bylaws require all members to pay 100% of the full unsubsidized cos

More ›