ty6853

22 ms·

271.
by ty6853 1y ago
Let's be extra generous and assume you meant leave and renounce. Now let's talk about those harrowing deductions, which you are somehow ignorant of. So it is decided you have to do X, otherwise leave, but actually leaving isn&#x27
272.
by ty6853 1y ago
You were caught in a lie about being able to leave to end your forward tax obligations to the US, and now you are doubling down. Or you still don't understand -- the US still taxes you after you leave the country, for income earned ou
273.
by ty6853 1y ago
I'm not sure you would even need political support. The courts would just have to uphold the property rights of the polluted, and your right to exercise derivatives on your property i.e. sell a a pollution easement on your property.
274.
by ty6853 1y ago
I think the more common scenario is something like "I bought R410 refrigerant so my elderly parents would not die during the next heat spell, knowing that these A/C appliances typically end in a leak or release event, meaning some
275.
by ty6853 1y ago
Yes, but this is the kind of thing Kaczynski wrote about in his manifesto. If you don't produce the product using the externality heavy process that reduces the cost, someone else will, and put you out of business. The whole economic
276.
by ty6853 1y ago
The US has worldwide, actually interplanetary taxation. Even if you leave you'll be under US tax net. If you renounce, again, that doesn't stop it because renouncing also costs a tax of ~$2000 and possibly an exit tax. But this
277.
by ty6853 1y ago
Body cams can be removed at light speed but somehow the process of rescheduling marijuana moves at the speed of molasses.
278.
by ty6853 1y ago
The court is happy to let AI be used against a defendent, but god forbid the defendent uses AI as a tool for their pro se defense.
279.
by ty6853 1y ago
Likening the real violence perpetuated amongst people without shelter in Chicago to some game is absolutely sickening.
280.
by ty6853 1y ago
Because when you're talking about federal/nation level spending it is easier to get people to spend money on a bridge or institution they have some chance of being able to drive to within a day rather than convincing a guy in Mont
281.
by ty6853 1y ago
> My wife, at the meantime, was doing visiting nursing in the same neighborhoods This is how they got to me. I was working in a hospital in a 'meh' business area surrounded by a high-crime predominantly black neighborhoods. Sur
282.
by ty6853 1y ago
I mean sure but if that doesn't work I have literally taken the el to an industrial district and slept on top of a warehouse, rather than getting picked over by people on the street.
283.
by ty6853 1y ago
You're probably not going to get killed in an actual war either, I would still want a gun and worry about what others might do with theirs.
284.
by ty6853 1y ago
Lol maybe in Evanston.
285.
by ty6853 1y ago
Lol having lived in Chicago and Cleveland let me explain how it works. They're not probably going to kill you. They're going to just take your shit, maybe beat the shit out of you or knock you out if you resist. In my case, I ma
286.
by ty6853 1y ago
No it's not. Last time I had a vehicle failure in a top 10 city the locals noticed, and put a gun to my head. You're a straight up moron if you sleep on the streets of Chicago without a weapon. Here's a hint, get on a rooft
287.
by ty6853 1y ago
At $100k / resettlement it might be the world's cheapest citizenship by investment program. The closest I can think of is the Comoros program which I believe Saudi or another Arab country used to get rid of a bunch of immigrants.
288.
by ty6853 1y ago
This is a huge relief, but it does come at a cost. What other people think of you is one of the largest inputs to access to jobs, sexual partners, and likelihood you'll be referred or witnessed against for prosecution for some inane z
289.
by ty6853 1y ago
The other courts in this case would be bailiffs who are judicial officers in some states.
290.
by ty6853 1y ago
Supreme court and many other courts have judicial armed officers of the court that are part of the judicial branch; they can enforce contempt or orders of the court. But of course they are way overpowered by the number of LEO in the execut
291.
by ty6853 1y ago
People have a way of believing anything when the alimony+child support reaches a number where you can just grab (at least a sizeable portion of ) the financial benefits of marriage without having to put in the work of being a partner.
292.
by ty6853 1y ago
Even judge Xinis [kilmar garcia] was talking a big game, but then folded after promising 'expedited discovery' and the consideration of contempt. She delays week after week and grants the executive the right to hide under the sha
293.
by ty6853 1y ago
Congress voted on tarriffs last night. It's no longer riding on a whim, the entire elected representatives voted on them and decided to keep them. Reversal failed 49-49. So the mad king theory, I think it was initially defendable, bu
294.
by ty6853 1y ago
Lol assuming CBP doesn't spend that money on migrant hunting squads and torture camps.
295.
by ty6853 1y ago
Sure but if it were legal I would be fine with hiring them to like, pave my driveway or something.
296.
by ty6853 1y ago
Maybe I'm the only one here but I don't see anything whatsoever wrong with employing literal genocidal terrorists in honest non-genocidal activity. Not that I support what this lady did, which was fraud and identity theft.
297.
by ty6853 1y ago
There was probably an army of NK workers to do the lifting. By design an American would have had responsibilities limited to signing the right dotted lines and being a pretty white face at the bank.
298.
by ty6853 1y ago
I don't know anything about Vance's book. I don't understand why people keep pointing to Musk or Vance as if I must be some devout follower or corrupted by same. Even when I was an actual communist in philosophy, as a young
299.
by ty6853 1y ago
If we're going to use a puritanical definition of socialism then we'll also use one for ownership. Under which the owners of capital under Naziism -- weren't. They were more akin to socialist party bosses -- do what the naz
300.
by ty6853 1y ago
All of which also happened in some 'communist' countries. the USSR came after all of those (who weren't Bolshevik aligned) but the Jews, they did let the jews live but they closed many of the synogogues and many of them had t

More ›