twothreeone

5 ms·

31.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
> one that uses data and intelligence to go after the worst, large-scale criminal operations and networks History shows that the main question with government and data collection is not "what X makes life easier for citizens" b
32.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
I looked at the actual article and your instinct is exactly right: it's precisely the kind of hand-waving that makes clicking or not clicking a clear decision point.
33.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
This is the definitive, honest result.
34.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
"phase", "gate", and "plumbing" as well..
35.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
Wow the video is much better.. the PR spend clearly went up a lot. Mainly just showing "real people" doing "real stuff".
36.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
Does Xi Jinping (or any of his Politburo colleagues) publish their income and/or tax records? Otherwise, this "we are so anti-corruption" stance is basically just political theater as the Courts themselves are CCP-bound.
37.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
Because it does, the review process is now no longer double blind. And I disagree, I think there is no obvious solution - though I would venture to guess that publishing the reviewer's names alongside their reviews upon rejection would
38.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
The problem is this: as an academic you tend to know the reviewer landscape within your field. You have seen this happen to a colleague before, they submitted a paper, it had interesting results - it was forcefully rejected by 1 or 2 extrem
39.
by twothreeone 3mo ago
ha! This was my first distro :)
40.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Interesting, thanks for the pointer! Though, since we're dealing in hypotheticals already: wouldn't the expectation be that whoever gained the upper hand on the world stage would've aimed for de-facto control over whichever c
41.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
wow, very humbling. I'm actually amazed how many people contributed to this. It's easy to get attribution for "cool new features", but arguable removing bad features is even more important for something as fundamental as
42.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Which really tells you more about the state of mind of people asking that question. What kind of person isn't curious about the puzzle of their own existence, or the nature of the physical reality they live in (and yes, by "being
43.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
The things is: it does _feel_ like you're moving faster when Claude is in the zone and does what it's supposed to. You're essentially flying a plane on auto pilot, occasionally telling it to slightly adjust course. Only that
44.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Thanks! yeah, maybe I'll try to look at that next..
45.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
> unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-MTP-GGUF I've actually tried this exact same model locally as well.. albeit on just a single 3090 at 128k context and I got around 40-60tok/s with Q4_K quantization. The thing that bugged me the m
46.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
It's not the verb "earning" that's different, it's the (implied) noun it is referring to: "wage" (AOC) vs. "capital" (Graham).
47.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Yeah he weirdly dodges it. Completely unnecessary too, because he could've just said something like "the average american male yields roughly 90k hours of labor over their lifetime before retirement, so earning a billion dollars o
48.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Didn't they famously have a search deal with Google (that they were also ultimately fined for - in the EU at least)? So there's definitely precedent with Google as a "partner".
49.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Yeah, it's not even clear what the true motivation is from the US side.. "get the Uranium out" by itself doesn't make sense, because (a) they can just enrich again (or even be supplied directly by Russia/NK) and (b)
50.
by twothreeone 4mo ago
Isn't it also possible that this happened to be one of the explicit pre-conditions for a treaty by the US?
51.
by twothreeone 5mo ago
Does it matter? The ultimate way to measure productivity is $$$.. companies that generate more $$$ with the same number of "people" are more "productive". Drilling that number down to orgs/teams/ICs is a politi
52.
by twothreeone 5mo ago
For a solo dev sure.. but isn't there a huge privacy difference between Anthropic and DeepSeek APIs as well? I assumed part of the cost for Anthropic was essentially a privacy premium.. (plus they offer B2B).
53.
by twothreeone 6mo ago
That was my impression as well. You have to babysit the AI the whole time and if you fail to do that it's basically your life (and others' of course) on the line.
54.
by twothreeone 7mo ago
- AT&T “unlimited” mobile plans - Purdue Pharma's OxyContin push - Juul marketing vaping products as a "safer alternative" to smoking - Facebook's sale of user data to Cambridge Analytica - Wells Fargo opening fake a
55.
by twothreeone 7mo ago
> rightfully convicted of what is indisputably criminal behaviour Consider the opposite view: if pretending to be a human is "criminal behavior" there are about 8 billion criminals walking around on this planet.. and in this ca
56.
by twothreeone 7mo ago
That's basically what I heard ten years ago from individuals (and even universities) for why they switched to Mint.. but even now, if you ask Perplexity for a "debian-based distro thats not ubuntu" Mint is the second option.
57.
by twothreeone 7mo ago
> To get the remaining 15%, which they are contractually obligated to acquire, they must purchase from the founder. As they are in violation of their contract if they fail to acquire the remaining 15%, the founder now has complete contro
58.
by twothreeone 8mo ago
Data doesn't belong to anyone, data is free :) zero-copy cost, delivery at speed of light.
59.
by twothreeone 8mo ago
The terminology is overloaded.. Tensors in QM are objects obeying transformation laws, in ML Tensors are just data arranged in multidimensional arrays. There are no constraints on how the data transforms.
60.
by twothreeone 10mo ago
Interesting.. I agree on the description but my experience was opposite. I enjoyed F1 much more, though I really enjoy all the technical stats and talks with the teams/engineers that develop the cars and find it to be an equal part of

More ›