Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
twodave
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
151.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Ostensibly not all known oil fields are actively being extracted. This fact alone makes it unlikely that discovering a new source would affect the price of oil, unless it can be retrieved using cheaper than the existing methods. It’s also w
152.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
This stuff is worse than drywall for a lot of reasons due to its brittleness. I’m not even sure paint would adhere to it as well as drywall.
153.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Propane also has to be pressurized, which complicates its use. Gasoline being liquid at rest is advantageous. That said, when I was in Rio in 2007 I saw plenty of cars running on pressurized natural gas. They were considered pretty crappy,
154.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Eh, don’t let other people define what is acceptable for production. Tests are nice but for most boilerplate type things nobody (and I mean NOBODY) writes unit or even integration tests. If you are deploying with the tolerance that you need
155.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Next is an ok choice (IMO), but there are definitely some things Next does that you want to be aware of up front. * It wants to be your back-end. If you have a separate back-end, get ready to write back-end auth code twice, and probably in
156.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
They could have better constrained the purchasing/selling API to avoid subterfuge like this having real monetary consequences. But the article about that would probably have been boring.
157.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. Puts the original point into focus.
158.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
> zuck saying he laid off poor performers (effectively screwing those people for no reason) Were they not actually performing poorly, then? Maybe I'm missing some context, but laying off poor performers is a good thing last I checke
159.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
AI may replace some workers, but it won't replace the worker. Rather it will augment the worker. Even in software, where people are acting like recent graduates are having the ladder pulled up from them, I think this is just a lack
160.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
People keep trying to tie these two things together, forgetting the fact that ZIRP also ended 3 years ago, and that combined with the end of the COVID-era employer credits are when the layoffs really began. I won't say LLMs are having
161.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Yes, being able to pay wages that amount to slavery opens a lot of doors. There is a lot of positive Chinese sentiment on this website, much of it exaggerated, and all of their accomplishments pretty much hinge on being able to exploit thei
162.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
I wouldn’t say I am anti-LLM, but I am definitely anti-AGI. And I think this comment is nudging me into a better understanding of why that is. I much prefer to be the “owner” of my devices and not just the “operator”. In fact, I think any m
163.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
This is not the intended workflow. It is meant to be dynamic in nature.
164.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
I’ve been doing a rewrite of some file import type stuff, using a new common data model for storage, and I’ve taken to basically pasting in the old code, commented out and telling it to fill the new object using the commented out content as
165.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Interesting, though not really a replacement for server-side sanitization. But as another layer of defense? Sure. I could see it useful especially in RTEs.
166.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Edit: thanks for the gracious reply. I was probably overly defensive myself. I didn’t read all of that, but what I gathered is that it’s relying on survey response about future expectation? And probably being conflated a bit with the end of
167.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
I agree mostly, though personally I expect LLMs to basically give me whitewashing. They don't innovate. They don't push back enough or take a step back to reset the conversation. They can't even remember something I told them
168.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Not low-value or it just wouldn't be on the board. Lower value? Maybe, but there are many, many reasons things get pushed down the backlog. As many reasons as there are kinds of companies. Most people don't work at one of the big
169.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Well, I would just say to take into account the fact that we're starting to see LLMs be responsible for substantial electricity use, to the point that AI companies are lobbying for (significant) added capacity. And remember that we
170.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
You’re assuming a lot about me that isn’t true, but let’s just say we can’t really know, can we? And I think it’s a bit reductionist to attribute the current job market to LLMs. The market started to suck long before LLMs became useful.
171.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
I’m not anti-AI; I use it every day. But I also think all this hand-wringing is overblown and unbalanced. LLMs, because of what they are, will never replace a thoughtful engineer. If you’re writing code for a living at the level of an LLM t
172.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
No, because they’d be waiting in the lengthy queues that would be necessary for anyone to use it. There are hard constraints to this tech that make what you’re talking about infeasible.
173.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Horses eat feed. Cars eat gasoline. LLMs eat electricity, and progress may even now be finding its limits in that arena. Besides the fact that just more compute and context size aren’t the right kind of progress. LLMs aren’t coming for your
174.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
It’s only 15 pages without the ads ;)
175.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
That assumes two things: 1. That such a tool couldn’t be limited to the big players (it could) and 2. That “small sites trying to run ads to get by,” aren’t part of the problem. I can understand why someone would believe this, but I believe
176.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
Oh awesome, thanks for linking.
177.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
For sure, it would be technically challenging. Especially if the click requires use of a secure cookie. But it doesn’t have to be perfect to be effective, either, at least at first.
178.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
I actually wonder if the whole anti-ad movement is moving in the wrong direction. And I’m right there with the author running a pi-hole, but I wonder if it would be better to have an extension that will click all of the ads in a way that
179.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
It’s likely a better roasting process and fresher beans. Large scale coffee roasters produce burnt, more acidic beans with chemicals added during the process.
180.
▲
by
twodave
10mo ago
This is typically true of coffee produced at scale. Large batches are often overcooked, chemically cooled and then left longer on the shelf. The result of these things is increased acidity. I have found that I can tolerate the small-batch l
More ›