twerkmeister

4 ms·

1.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
The data set quality and much of the methodology is just as abysmal as the writeup... as pointed out in my second post: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/dis... So it must have been the &quo
2.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
I updated my post title to reflect the original title and send a mail to the mods to restore the original title. Lets see. I was not aware of the editorialized title rule otherwise I had updated my post before linking it here.
3.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
What do you think my two long posts in the discussion forum of kaggle are? I am the author and the evidence I present very much justified the original title.
4.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
They also host the arc prize challenge with prices up to 850k https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/arc-prize-2026-arc-agi-3...
5.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
I am the author of the linked article, so you say my opinion should be allowed in the title?
6.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
They also removed the fact it was a competition hosted by a prestigious AI lab
7.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
Please note this Post was just renamed without my involvement from: Blatant AI slop just won a 25K USD Deepmind Kaggle Grand Prize into "Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluate process and selection of winners"
8.
by twerkmeister 3mo ago
That's fair and your good right. However know that my frustrations stems from spending two and a half days feeling like in the story of the emperors new clothes digging into this shit that was made king by a number of employees of one
9.
Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners(kaggle.com)
474 points by twerkmeister 3mo ago|298 comments
10.
Show HN: Tokenflood – simulate arbitrary loads on instruction-tuned LLMs(github.com)
21 points by twerkmeister 11mo ago|0 comments