tway223

6 ms·

1.
by tway223 1y ago
The west actually had quite some deals with them recently. If not for the trade war there could’ve been a lot more. To some extent it is like the Temu vibe.
2.
by tway223 1y ago
There is no careful planning. Just take a look at the waste, the debts and the rapid policy changes. It is more like industrial Darwinism at scale. The main fuel was mainly WTO , export and slavery labor. The industrialization in my opinion
3.
by tway223 1y ago
China’s success is not because of the policies but rather despite of them. Though not sure how sustainable these successes would be.
4.
by tway223 2y ago
I have been wondering if someone could improve golang's cgo infra using clang like what zig is doing..
5.
by tway223 2y ago
That was to answer the previous question. Also the point is why Chinese companies can produce infra work in a cheap and fast way. With regard to US companies, I don’t see that is possible with MSFT, AMZN, AAPL, and likely GOOG as well. (Don
6.
by tway223 2y ago
I would say most if not every large company in China has their own AI infra stack, partially because tech talent is relatively more abundant and partially some of the tech leads have been exposed to western tech via open source and work exp
7.
by tway223 2y ago
To be blunt this is exactly what is wrong with the “leadership” mindset in the west, as decisions are often made without understanding the “nuances” yet they are confident it would work.
8.
by tway223 2y ago
For understandable reasons
9.
by tway223 2y ago
Something definitely doesn’t smell right for Trump/Musk.
10.
by tway223 2y ago
Exactly. This is all about power grab without going through a proper due process. The government is shitty and inefficient but DOGE is not the way to fix it.
11.
by tway223 2y ago
What DOGE is doing has happened in China 10 years ago. Instead of “fighting corruption” they claim “government efficiency”, but the ultimate goal is to silence and destroy any opposition. Because bureaucracy is inherently universally corrup
12.
by tway223 2y ago
Who will be the buyer? ORCL or IBM?
13.
by tway223 2y ago
It is probably a lot more practical to protect Taiwan than hoping somebody may rebuild Intel for the next 5-10 years. Having TSMC production in US is also more approachable for the mid term.
14.
by tway223 2y ago
Forking is not the issue. The real issue is the (mis-)presentation of the additional work and value they bring to the fork. Based on the code commits in the two repos it is minimal if anything at all, while they clearly claimed they have 10
15.
by tway223 3y ago
This collection has been on the internet for quite a while, likely started around 2015-ish. It is highly duplicated and I suspect the total number is around 4 million books. Still a lot. The source was from a company named DuXiu, or previou
16.
by tway223 4y ago
They are records with user info, which are different from user records. Mostly likely just user activities. Cabinet = jigui in Chinese. It looks like something for operation tracking. Just look at the table names.
17.
by tway223 4y ago
To be clear this is not a TikTok ad database. This is a tracking database from a third party who manages their clients' business with TikTok (and others). 2 billion ad views are not that big. You are likely looking at logs not the core
18.
by tway223 4y ago
The data could be very likely legit. But they are not TikTok's user database. It is more like TikTok's ad/activity log for some customers. The passwords are for the logins from those customers if any. This also explains why W
19.
by tway223 4y ago
They are legit. But just not from TikTok. Think of a system where you can manage your ad spending and user growth with TikTok/WeChat (like product promotions, referring from a friend etc.)
20.
by tway223 4y ago
It is not a TikTok leak. It is more like from a system which is integrated with TikTok/WeChat for marketing / e-commerce usage. Pretty obvious if you look at the tables closely. And the "cabinet" means hosting cabinets (
21.
by tway223 5y ago
It is technically not RaTG13. The labs have samples from patients who infected with RaTG13 and never publish them. I think those samples are more likely the source but it doesn't change the full picture.