tw1984

9 ms·

121.
by tw1984 8mo ago
spot dog is hydraulically powered junk, unitree is motor driven from day one. Boston Dynamics was forced to switch to a motor driven architecture after it is proven by unitree. Boston Dynamics is the follower here.
122.
by tw1984 8mo ago
> Agibot is not in Shenzhen? AGIBot is the poster boy of the municipal government of Shanghai. > major cities/provinces like Hangzhou, Suzhou, Shanghai or Hefei started bankrolling talents and enterprises so they too can have maj
123.
by tw1984 8mo ago
> balancing their own motion a bit individually. check this 4 months old video below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPSLMX_V38E I'd willing to bet that it is already close to impossible to get the robot lose its ba
124.
by tw1984 8mo ago
Well, that is obviously another overcapacity issue, this time for robotics. In the last 10 weeks, there were - Unitree's army of robots https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4IOJH9Akhg Robotera sword dancing robots https:&
125.
by tw1984 8mo ago
Dario is like 10x better than Altman.
126.
by tw1984 8mo ago
We all need to be extremely happy for the fact that AI is not controlled by people like Altman.
127.
by tw1984 8mo ago
oh, then explain to me how both China is leading in both robotics and AI. if it is because of "low cost of labor in addition to lack of environmental regulation", you'd be seeing countries like india beating the US and EU.
128.
by tw1984 8mo ago
they want ads and adult stuff, now they removed the term safely. what a big surprise!
129.
by tw1984 8mo ago
startup idea - provide personal security services to people targeted by AI.
130.
by tw1984 8mo ago
that software is called autonomous agents, the term autonomous has nothing to do with human in the loop, it is the complete opposite.
131.
by tw1984 8mo ago
I just checked with ChatGPT, Opus and Gemini whether Netanyahu is a war criminal for what happened in Gaza, they all worked damn hard to defend Netanyahu to the extend that as if Netanyahu was their client. I asked the exact same question t
132.
by tw1984 8mo ago
exactly, we all need to use CIA/NSA approved models to stay safe. very smart idea!
133.
by tw1984 8mo ago
> In 2 years you could make that investment back in pay raise. you can't be a happy uber driver making more money in the next 24 months by having a fancy car fitted with the best FSD in town when all cars in your town have the same
134.
by tw1984 8mo ago
I don't know what you are smoking but that thing must be strong. Have fun.
135.
by tw1984 9mo ago
you intentionally omitted the most important context here - those sad deaths happened after many army APCs and Tanks were attacked & destroyed. https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/1k2ungn/pla_a
136.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> They've been using soft power for some time with Venezuela. They've been importing Venezuelan oil. if someone goes to your local walmart and buy stuff from them, is that considered as using soft power on walmart? LOL
137.
by tw1984 9mo ago
show me any photo or video showing the tank man of Tiananmen actually got run over by the tank. you got brainwashed.
138.
by tw1984 9mo ago
no, it is an American company with Americans holding 80% ownership.
139.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> presented a new model to a lot of countries. that is a common mistake. it is called the "If China can do it, I can do it too" symptom, which has been discussed like a million times on Chinese social media. interestingly, the
140.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> The great leap forward You need far better propaganda materials for your "great leap forward" blames in 2026. There were bad policies, but the intention good, it was all about moving the country forward. It failed horribly wi
141.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> And why did Qualcomm pay all that money for Ventana recently? You do not expect them to release high-end RISC-V chips? I mean, they already ship many low-end ones. Ventana is an extremely bad example to be used here. It is acquisition
142.
by tw1984 9mo ago
are you joking? if you search their public media releases, they mentioned that their cores are used by some imaginary vendors for undisclosed platforms. just go and check how CLOSE those junks are. product names and models are always omitte
143.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> There is (so far) nothing 'open' about RISC-V. with the majority players being Chinese vendors (those you can buy, not including those building RISC-V for their own in-house applications), RISC-V is far less open than ARM or
144.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> How is that feeling "false"? People running RISC-V systems are different, or at least they have different motivations than you. this is like saying being homeless is a lifestyle choice. some people argue that with a passion,
145.
by tw1984 9mo ago
exactly. in fact, such ISA is only going to fuel more closed ecosystems as it made hundreds of Chinese vendors to join the game for free, they all suddenly got the chance to build their totally closed platforms.
146.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> Some people care less about squeezing out performance and more about open standards. I like having more choices, especially open ones. you need to be totally autistic to believe that Chinese vendors are going to share anything meaningf
147.
by tw1984 9mo ago
Let's be honest - RISC-V doesn't make sense to 99% users at this stage. ARM is cheaper for 99% use cases, has far more choices on the market, much better performance, greater software ecosystem and tooling. For 99% users, the only
148.
by tw1984 9mo ago
when you have been selling the same junk for decades, you can always rename it and keep selling the same junk. just imagine all those poor engineers who have to maintain such a junk.
149.
by tw1984 9mo ago
never ever saw that "What's your use-case" in Claude Code.
150.
by tw1984 9mo ago
> US/EU automakers are still struggling to offer anything barely competitive. Imagine yourself being one of the top management guys in one of those legacy car makers, you've spent your entire life building what you "earned

More ›