tw04

34 ms·

601.
by tw04 2y ago
Much like tolerance. You can’t have a free market if all parties don’t agree. The US proposed a free market. China countered with a closed market and we’re finally understanding they were serious.
602.
by tw04 2y ago
The federal government deciding to bring charges or not are a completely different matter from an executive order. If you can point to an executive order that "legalizes" marijuana when there are laws explicitly making it illegal
603.
by tw04 2y ago
Executive orders have historically been a way to get things done when the law is ambiguous. It has not, as far as I know, been used to try to directly contradict existing law that has been upheld by the judiciary branch. I don't even
604.
by tw04 2y ago
It’s actually illegal for people who aren’t currently the president to negotiate as if they were.
605.
by tw04 2y ago
This whole thing works when you’re small, right up until it doesn’t. If you never have a call with a customer you never have a relationship. If you never have a relationship you have no idea what’s important to them, if there’s risk of chu
606.
by tw04 2y ago
> And also that TRUMP turned out to be the lesser of the evils. You’re talking about the guy who moved the US embassy into contested territory essentially justifying Israel’s expansion? Something no previous president would even conside
607.
by tw04 2y ago
I’ll ignore for a second you completely avoided the point to move the goal posts. Alcohol isn’t a natural food, it’s a result of food rotting. Much like rotten meat, you can naturally assume negative side effects Red meat has positive bene
608.
by tw04 2y ago
>There is no such thing as proving something "safe". Go back and re-read the parent comment. The important point you are missing is that basically anything can be "linked" to cancer, and if you adopt the argument you
609.
by tw04 2y ago
>How do you engineer this, do you think? If every burgerflipper at Wendy's owned stock, the performance of that stock isn't connected to performance of their job at all. They can fuck off completely, and the stock either rises
610.
by tw04 2y ago
>We (humans) don't subsist on some Matrix-like slop that provides all of our nutrients for no pleasure. Eating is a weird combination of necessity and pleasure activity. You could ask: if there's even a slight chance it causes
611.
by tw04 2y ago
Yes? Employees should have a vested interest in the financial success of their company, and an ownership stake. That's how it used to be "in the good old days" when folks had both pensions and stock tying them to the long-t
612.
by tw04 2y ago
While they reclaim 90% of the water, given the immense amount of water they use, it's still an exorbitant amount. With all 6 fabs online, and water reclamation in place, it's expected to be the equivalent of 160,000 homes: https:
613.
by tw04 2y ago
Serious question: If there's even a slight chance it causes cancer, and it adds nothing to the food other than a slightly more appealing color, why risk it? What is the benefit?
614.
by tw04 2y ago
You're missing one of the single greatest factors which is that shortly after that time, executive compensation became wholly disconnected from worker compensation. If executive compensation were tied to average employee compensation,
615.
by tw04 2y ago
Neither does zfs, that’s a widely repeated red herring from people trying to do dedup in the very early days, and people who misunderstood how it used ram to do caching.
616.
by tw04 2y ago
Does the how matter if we can’t replicate it the same way?
617.
by tw04 2y ago
This is the case with any parity based raid, they just hide it or lie to you in various ways. If you have two 6TB dives and two 12TB drives in a single raid-6 array, it is physically impossible to have two drive parity once you exceed 12T
618.
by tw04 2y ago
You can run raid-z across partitions to utilize the full drive just like synology does with their “hybrid raid” - you just shouldn’t.
619.
by tw04 2y ago
Except you shouldn’t use btrfs for any parity based raid if you value your data at all. In fact, I’m not aware if any vendor that has implemented btrfs with parity based raid, they all resort to btrfs on md.
620.
by tw04 2y ago
Other than the additional capital outlay, this shouldn't prove a hurdle to anyone looking to do similar. Migrating from VSAN to external storage like NetApp is a non-disruptive process. And frankly VSAN has always been pretty horribl
621.
by tw04 2y ago
That’s literally what the new Facebook policy is that she’s referring to in the article… it was previously banned, zuck has decided that it’s now perfectly acceptable, if not encouraged behavior.
622.
by tw04 2y ago
Netgear is a US based company that makes Ethernet over power adapters.
623.
by tw04 2y ago
Who is paying for this move and all the requisite supporting infrastructure? You aren’t just dropping it from a helicopter and calling it a day.
624.
by tw04 2y ago
I think people overthink this. The reality is far more simple, just ask yourself: what would be in the best interest of Putin? Trump threatening to take military action against Greenland due to its strategic military importance legitimizes
625.
by tw04 2y ago
Not sure why you’re being downvoted. Elon has been pretty blatant about how he thinks Americans are lazy for not essentially living at work. https://futurism.com/the-byte/elon-musk-chinese-workers
626.
by tw04 2y ago
Because it's more expensive for less performance with less control. If it were 5% worse performance for 7% more cost, most people would probably not bat an eye. When it can be 50% less performant for 200% more cost, eventually someone
627.
by tw04 2y ago
And yet nature has historically found balance. Humans, on a large scale, seem incapable of doing the same. At this point humans have become a perpetual extinction event with no end in sight.
628.
by tw04 2y ago
Because there are a shocking number of folks that don’t realize just how cheap you can get a used mini-pc off eBay. And if the only thing you’re missing is gpio that can easily be added. And frankly our planet needs to do a lot more reusin
629.
by tw04 2y ago
Except they weren’t protesting or inconveniencing the government or the oligarchs, just their fellow citizens.
630.
by tw04 2y ago
On what? Fox News? Because that wasn’t at all how it was portrayed by Klepper who actually took the time to be onsite. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbmiKG56zuw

More ›