tvural

13 ms·

61.
by tvural 10y ago
"A large percentage of that time is then spent marking up grammar and spelling." As an aside, I don't think this is the optimal way to teach people how to write. What were the ideas in those papers? How were they organized? D
62.
Finding a Horseshoe on the Beaches of Rio – On Chaos Theory (1998) [pdf](www6.cityu.edu.hk)
22 points by tvural 10y ago|2 comments
63.
Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting [pdf](cs.toronto.edu)
4 points by tvural 10y ago|0 comments
64.
by tvural 11y ago
I think the main idea can be summarized pretty simply. The most important next step towards general intelligence is creating a learning algorithm that can solve a sufficiently general class of problems without much tweaking by humans, and i
65.
by tvural 11y ago
I appreciate some of the writer's points, but he's so eager to prove his point that he makes some obvious mistakes. The 38% of founders who failed took on average a few months to do so. Quality of research papers is produced is no
66.
by tvural 11y ago
Any errors in the actual content of the paper shouldn't take long to turn up. There seems to be nothing more high-powered than calculus used in the proofs.
67.
by tvural 11y ago
I've noticed the same attitude towards math instruction in college, but sometimes I can't help sympathizing with the professors. Usually when you teach a course you expect to learn something in the process, but that's simply
68.
by tvural 11y ago
How human mathematicians decide that a problem is "important" is not as arbitrary as people seem to think. The work mathematicians choose to do can be heavily influenced by fashion, but in general, a problem is important if its so