tuyiown

6 ms·

1.
by tuyiown 1mo ago
> because great code requires intent If can put properly engineered intent in the prompt that is verifiable, it works wonders. Anything that can defaults to the llm doing its way, you're right, it just can't converge to good, n
2.
by tuyiown 2mo ago
I’d be rather interested in a recommandation that don’t comes with de usuals pits of others solutions and comes with a the actual css code that will apply to the element displayed in autocomplete while editing the html / jsx.
3.
by tuyiown 2mo ago
> coward This can be a result of unexpected and costly if not worse, surprises.
4.
by tuyiown 3mo ago
The hard truth is that as much as you think yourself as a "proper" gamer, this segment always has, always will, _not_ be the proper target segment. Don't forget that mobile gaming has more revenue than everything else… combin
5.
by tuyiown 3mo ago
I like that we can write the story that Microsoft sold their software with the home computer on the idea of productivity at home while the actual incentive was entertainment, and valve ends up justifying buying gaming hardware with the ince
6.
by tuyiown 4mo ago
we had "god particle" too …
7.
by tuyiown 4mo ago
> So I can find a bug, I can fix it, but I am not allowed to tell them how exactly I did it. Pin pointing the issue is way more than valuable than code. If you wrote a fix, you have analyzed the bug. The value is there, not in the fix. S
8.
by tuyiown 4mo ago
> at requires explanation beyond the material, that is axiomatically assumed without evidence Nobody talked about anything out of neurons. The question is still open.
9.
by tuyiown 4mo ago
git push . <branch1>:<branch2> git pull . <branch2>:<branch1>
10.
by tuyiown 6mo ago
You're right, there is plenty of space for features that require AI to work but that are undistinguishable from "classical" feature. Better autocompletion is a proven one for example.
11.
by tuyiown 6mo ago
Those people generally are not eager for feedback especially if it's even remotely perceived as negative or some kind of gatekeeping. The only way to avoid getting furious about this is to deeply understand that you can't require
12.
by tuyiown 6mo ago
It’s great but the animations when catching a new orbit (sparks and combo announcements) is making hard to follow the ball, I realized I missed many shots due to this after some games.
13.
by tuyiown 7mo ago
I wouldn't advise polyfills on this one, it entirely depends on the browser ability to evaluate cross scripting and cross origin rule on a arbitrary snippet. This is not a convenience API.
14.
by tuyiown 7mo ago
This is nice. The best part is that all aspects of network access are now properly controlled so that security transitioned from a chain of trusted code to a chain of trusted security setup on hosts, with existing workable safe defaults.
15.
by tuyiown 8mo ago
I've been using this format for almost 10 years, and I only see increasing adoption. Why would I be pessimistic?
16.
by tuyiown 8mo ago
> That's a terribly nihilistic outlook on language. I'm pretty sure any linguist will agree with this definition. All language normalisation is an afterthought.
17.
by tuyiown 8mo ago
Looks to me that _you_ conclude it's related to LED, I couldn't find that stated in the abstract, it might just be related to a general increase of artificial lightening, regardless of the source.
18.
by tuyiown 8mo ago
I was expecting a spin about the faster horses
19.
by tuyiown 9mo ago
You're really reducing a whole economic situation to a currency issue ?
20.
by tuyiown 9mo ago
I not sure if I should be relieved or worried about my newfound non-existence.
21.
by tuyiown 10mo ago
Because nothing can beat productivity of a motivated team building code that they are proud of. The mental energy spent becomes the highest reward. As for profit, it _compounds_ as for every other business. The fact that this is lost as a c
22.
by tuyiown 10mo ago
> I may have developed some kind of paranoia reading HN recently My comments being downvoted, pretty rare lately, were about never discussed but legitimate points about AI that I validated IRL. I have no resonance about the way AI is dis
23.
by tuyiown 10mo ago
> flows in one direction _Everything_ flows in one direction, all particles goes in a straight line from their self reference, fields "modifying direction" is just an observer point of view. The separation of time and space is
24.
by tuyiown 10mo ago
I've not seen Global Communication mentioned, 76:14 really is masterpiece. (Gamers will recognize a tune featured on GTA IV)
25.
by tuyiown 10mo ago
While it's very legitimate question, the answer is between the lines in the README, and it mostly means that there is a user space binary compatibility for everything that is implemented. It might seem obscure, but syscalls to get acce
26.
by tuyiown 11mo ago
It might be technically correct, but such an easy take is unethical and depraved.
27.
by tuyiown 11mo ago
14 years as your main driver ? Because that what we’re talking about.
28.
by tuyiown 11mo ago
Maxed out a mbp, I couldn’t get more than a bit than 8k. And comparable is probably generous.
29.
by tuyiown 11mo ago
NaN comes from parsing results or Infinity occurring in operations. I personally ends up more to use Number.isFinite(), which will be false on both occurrences when I need a real (haha) numeric answer.
30.
by tuyiown 11mo ago
While thinking that current mathematical model replicate accurately a fondamental aspect of biological neural network might be right, it doesn't mean that nothing is missing to achieve the stated goal of true intelligence. Maybe we&#x2

More ›