tux3

65 ms·

961.
by tux3 4y ago
Rewrite their own DNA is a little misleading, because the actual DNA codons don't normally change. But cells can affect gene expression throught multiple mechanisms, so that part of the DNA gets activated or de-activated . You can use
962.
by tux3 4y ago
Note that speed is relative, but time dilation is not. That's the twin paradox, they're both relatively moving away from each other, but only one 'ages slower'. Though I don't know what it means to say a photon does
963.
by tux3 4y ago
A more precise model still might be to try to factor in the expected loss in healthy years for the donor, and the average lifespan gain of a kidney recipient. If you pull a child out of the way of a speeding truck, you've saved their l
964.
by tux3 4y ago
I did not read GP as attacking a point you (haven't) made. It's merely extra information. Please assume good faith, otherwise discussions escalate into accusations.
965.
by tux3 4y ago
I think this is overall a very well written article, as someone not involved with EA, it seems a good critique of EA. But! This actually makes me more interested in EA, because the criticism only really chips away small caveats in the ide
966.
by tux3 4y ago
They don't mind using the third dimension, like dropping down to your knees or hiding near/on a ceiling. I've had one try to go behind my back while I was following it. They're clever enough to not move once hidden so ma
967.
by tux3 4y ago
Sure. This has happened before and they do eventually fix it. Then a different problem might happen on another page a few months later, and this'll last a few weeks.
968.
by tux3 4y ago
I frequently cannot log in to my bank with Firefox. The problem is that my bank's website was made by a bank, but as a Firefox user this impacts me in my daily life.
969.
by tux3 4y ago
>The level of downvoting and non-engagement about my comments you can observe on HN is just a symptom of a humanity that simply don't care above the surface layer of attention nor care deeply about the human condition and is auto-pe
970.
by tux3 4y ago
Your solution sounds good, but at which point do I integrate it with my FTP account? I have it mounted locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem
971.
by tux3 5y ago
I think this is the presentation and press release they published for this trial: https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_d9ae571e8ab35abbf8204c... https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/202110130053
972.
by tux3 5y ago
Worth noting this is targeting ML applications, so I don't think you'll be able to display even a text console with it for the foreseeable future. But I love that this is even in the realm of possibilities! There's no reason
973.
by tux3 5y ago
There's no wrong way to play, but savescumming makes it a different kind of game! Sadly the AIs (nethackchallenge.com) are not yet good enough to show us what closer to optimal play looks like.
974.
by tux3 5y ago
I assume this page describes what changed since 1.0: Since the original release 1.0 of the WebAssembly specification, a number of proposals for extensions have been integrated. The following sections provide an overview of what has ch
975.
by tux3 5y ago
Yes. If you extract keys, you win the game. I think their best answer is a sort of blacklist system where if Intel becomes aware one of their key has leaked, their servers could stop telling people it is genuine (this gets into the details
976.
by tux3 5y ago
The CPU has keys that you verify by asking Intel, is the short of it. Of course if you're inside the hypervisor and being software emulated, it could do anything to you. The idea is you verify enclaves remotely, so no other system woul
977.
by tux3 5y ago
If anything deserves to be patronizing, it is probably high-energy physics. The reader should not expect to truly understand anything, or be able to deduce anything, after reading the pop-sci explanations of particle physics experiments. An
978.
by tux3 5y ago
People fix complex bugs in the nvidia.ko binary blob, so who knows!
979.
by tux3 5y ago
Apple's history of membership in AOM is complicated™. They joined late and became a founding member retroactively, but I wouldn't use that as a very strong signal. Apple is never the first to support open standards.
980.
by tux3 5y ago
A tetrafoo is four times the size of a barbaz. Tetrafoos are pretty big things, about the size of a washing machine. Now I've said nothing specific about either these things, besides size. Can you tell me if a barbaz fits through a doo
981.
by tux3 5y ago
Is "Sheraton in receptions" speech to text for serotonin receptors :) ?
982.
by tux3 5y ago
I think they mean that C++ has a lot of momentum in graphics and HPC. So in their model of the world, students who learn Rust would be surprised that there are people who do not use Rust.
983.
by tux3 5y ago
People say Bytedance (Tiktok) has an excellent recommendation system, better at adjusting to interest changes than the other platforms. Personally I always go out of my way to get the chronological view on twitter, but I have to say I am cu
984.
by tux3 5y ago
Nitpicking the nitpick: the energy is what's in the fields, but the electrical wires aren't just for show, the electrons do need to be able to move in the wire for there to be a current, and the physical properties of the wire hav
985.
by tux3 5y ago
Oh, that is several levels deeper! PCIe is a big standard with several layers of abstraction, and it's far from passive. The different versions of PCIe use a different encoding, so it's hard to sum it all up in a couple sentence
986.
by tux3 5y ago
Does this mean BDNF in adult humans does not actually promote neurogenesis?
987.
by tux3 5y ago
I was not familiar with the term. Apparently, there is a subreddit: https://reddit.com/r/schizopostingmemes/comments/qy0ch6/
988.
by tux3 5y ago
The errata from the aforementionned Lectures is quite a list if I remember correctly, so probably a few people :)
989.
by tux3 5y ago
Closed source for security reasons? Do you mean it would not be secure if people were able to see the source?
990.
by tux3 5y ago
In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[12] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning physicist, Steven Chu, called it "extremely unlikely&quot

More ›