4 ms·
In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[12] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning phys
by tux3 5y ago
In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[12] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning physicist, Steven Chu, called it "extremely unlikely".[23] The following year, a 2000 patent based on its hydrino-related technology[24][25] was later withdrawn by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) due to contradictions with known physics laws and other concerns about the viability of the described processes, citing Park and others.[26]
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power
Every submission you've made seems to be about this company (https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=dave333 https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=dave333).
- dave333 5y agoSo how do these Nobel prize winners explain dark matter? Do "known physics laws" not evolve as new discoveries are made? Wikipedia is policed by skeptics that only support the status quo. IMO that article is not a fair description of Brilliant Light Power. As for my submissions, if as I believe hydrinos turn out to be real, it will be the greatest scientific discovery since the genome, so worth harping on about.