tumult

10 ms·

91.
by tumult 3y ago
Assuming that software won't receive legal personhood seems like a pretty good foundation. If that's no longer the case, you have much crazier things to worry about than copyright infringement.
92.
by tumult 3y ago
> You're speaking as if it's a given that the issue comes down to software not being people, therefore society as a group can make software do whatever it wants even if it doesn't own it. Yes. It's an object or writin
93.
by tumult 3y ago
You aren't software. The laws that apply to people reading and learning do not apply to software. Software isn't people. It can't be liable, it isn't taken to court. It can't go to jail, it can't marry, it can&
94.
by tumult 3y ago
What? Did we watch the same video? The opposite is true. A large portion of the video covers the history of notation and how expressive it is. And he specifically doesn't say that an ugly numbering system is the solution. In fact, the
95.
by tumult 3y ago
Outside next to a building is the worst place to be, as debris can detach and fall from the sides and tops of buildings. If you're indoors, stay indoors. Furniture that can fall over or slide around is supposed to already be secured to
96.
by tumult 3y ago
That's not the information that dialog is purporting to display. That's a theoretical thing you've made up for this comment.
97.
by tumult 3y ago
Sanity check, not min().
98.
by tumult 3y ago
Because the reply was written like this: > … but I bet even an LLM these days would know and tell you … The "even" here says that knowledge of the filesystem is basic. > I'm not one to trust AI much at all … This part s
99.
by tumult 3y ago
> You're making the same mistake if you think that's "incorrect information" No, that would be a different type of mistake. > you'd only take some effort to learn instead of complaining because they don't
100.
by tumult 3y ago
I think that's fair when you consider it all together.
101.
by tumult 3y ago
Why does the user care about how many times an iterator passes over an inode? The Finder is reporting incorrect information to them and may lead them to make bad decisions, like buying unnecessary external storage drives. You've missed
102.
by tumult 3y ago
No. There is not 60TB of data on the disk, which is what the GUI is reporting in the article. The GUI doesn't say that 60TB of data would exist if the snapshots were each individually flattened and expanded to another filesystem. It sa
103.
by tumult 3y ago
You're making the mistake that you're accusing the article of. Of course the author knows these things. As you just showed. Yet, the Finder GUI still reports bad information. Information that can mislead users into making bad deci
104.
by tumult 3y ago
I had the opposite experience. Gmail's filter was useless, letting in tons of spam, and then putting normal emails from family members, also using gmail, and who I have emailed many times in the past, into spam. Fastmail's is dras
105.
by tumult 3y ago
So, they remove it in 12 months and your code wasn't ready for the change, and people mock you for having not been prepared by updating your code. The Python people have told you to remove it, so nobody will have any sympathy for you i
106.
by tumult 3y ago
They will be removed: datetime.datetime’s utcnow() and utcfromtimestamp() are deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
107.
by tumult 3y ago
I haven't heard anything about the updates causing performance problems, but maybe you read something I didn't?
108.
by tumult 3y ago
You've also made an assumption. That attack vs. react is is symmetrical. It's not.
109.
by tumult 3y ago
It doesn't have to be profitable for them. It can just exist, be the only option, and prevent others from making a competitive or superior product, forcing others out of the business.
110.
by tumult 3y ago
On by default. If you still don't understand: this feature and setting used to not exist. Now it does. And it's on by default. So, it has been turned on for everyone. This is a thing that used to not exist, and now it exists for e
111.
by tumult 3y ago
The guy bought another Apple laptop, so I don’t know why you think he’s a hater. Apple is well known for screwing individuals over when applying vague policies, then fixing the situation after the person runs to the press.
112.
by tumult 3y ago
It protects the people in the building. Likewise, arresting a serial killer protects anyone they would have killed next.
113.
by tumult 3y ago
That's not true. We have things in place to protect people and objects from lightning strikes. For example, lightning protection systems on tall buildings.
114.
by tumult 3y ago
Release candidate means it could have gone out as a release. RC2 ended up being the release version.
115.
by tumult 3y ago
It was in the release candidate. It was in the betas, too, and they submitted it as a bug early on, and it wasn't fixed in any of the betas or the first release candidate. This is covered in the article.
116.
by tumult 3y ago
What? How is someone who snatched your phone out of your hand and ran away going to know your password and authentication information needed to authorize a parts replacement?
117.
by tumult 3y ago
Apple requires “notarization,” not just code signing. If you code sign your app and don’t “notarize” it, it will refuse to run. Like it will be harder for the end user to run it than if you had not code signed it at all. Submitting for “not
118.
by tumult 3y ago
From news links and comments here on this site, especially around 2018 when Tumblr was going through repeated App Store rejections. I think people, including myself, infer it from this information: 1. Apple executives like Phil Schiller use
119.
by tumult 3y ago
Do you have any information about this? Where did you hear this? I'd always heard it was because some people at Apple used Twitter, but nobody used Tumblr, so Tumblr didn't get a free pass from arbitrary torment.
120.
by tumult 3y ago
The cases where your locked device is absolutely necessary will approach 100%.

More ›