tuffle

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by tuffle 12y ago

   It's good to hear that it will be fixed, but it's also troubling that a front-facing security issue took a #1 HN post, followed by debate in the comments before Docker recognized it.
2. 2.▲
   by tuffle 12y ago

   > but are not claiming that it's more secure yet That's a bit disingenous. The CLI clearly makes a security claim here, and you know very well that users will take it as one. I'm all for "working on ways to make image
3. 3.▲
   by tuffle 12y ago

   > Let's be real here. If Docker was 'just' an open source project, it would move at 50% of the pace and security issues like this would still not be solved. That's wild speculation, and the elephant in the room (Linux
4. 4.▲
   by tuffle 12y ago

   Which, if you put the pieces together, clarifies that the purpose of new Docker features is to lasso in fragmentation and make sure you're going to buy their vCenter/vSphere rather than any alternative. This also clarifies why thi
5. 5.▲
   by tuffle 12y ago

   That one seemed pretty ridiculous to me as well. If your project's direction is constant but your user's understanding is changing, then either you're failing to communicate or (worse) your product is actively forsaking its u